Commit c33d7887 authored by Veaceslav Falico's avatar Veaceslav Falico Committed by David S. Miller

bonding: rework bond_3ad_xmit_xor() to use bond_for_each_slave() only

Currently, there are two loops - first we find the first slave in an
aggregator after the xmit_hash_policy() returned number, and after that we
loop from that slave, over bonding head, and till that slave to find any
suitable slave to send the packet through.

Replace it by just one bond_for_each_slave() loop, which first loops
through the requested number of slaves, saving the first suitable one, and
after that we've hit the requested number of slaves to skip - search for
any up slave to send the packet through. If we don't find such kind of
slave - then just send the packet through the first suitable slave found.

Logic remains unchainged, and we skip two loops. Also, refactor it a bit
for readability.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 544a028e
...@@ -2417,15 +2417,15 @@ int bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(struct bonding *bond, struct ad_info *ad_info) ...@@ -2417,15 +2417,15 @@ int bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(struct bonding *bond, struct ad_info *ad_info)
int bond_3ad_xmit_xor(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) int bond_3ad_xmit_xor(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
{ {
struct slave *slave, *start_at;
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(dev); struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(dev);
struct slave *slave, *first_ok_slave;
struct aggregator *agg;
struct ad_info ad_info;
struct list_head *iter; struct list_head *iter;
int slave_agg_no;
int slaves_in_agg; int slaves_in_agg;
int agg_id; int slave_agg_no;
int i;
struct ad_info ad_info;
int res = 1; int res = 1;
int agg_id;
read_lock(&bond->lock); read_lock(&bond->lock);
if (__bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(bond, &ad_info)) { if (__bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(bond, &ad_info)) {
...@@ -2438,20 +2438,28 @@ int bond_3ad_xmit_xor(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) ...@@ -2438,20 +2438,28 @@ int bond_3ad_xmit_xor(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
agg_id = ad_info.aggregator_id; agg_id = ad_info.aggregator_id;
if (slaves_in_agg == 0) { if (slaves_in_agg == 0) {
/*the aggregator is empty*/
pr_debug("%s: Error: active aggregator is empty\n", dev->name); pr_debug("%s: Error: active aggregator is empty\n", dev->name);
goto out; goto out;
} }
slave_agg_no = bond->xmit_hash_policy(skb, slaves_in_agg); slave_agg_no = bond->xmit_hash_policy(skb, slaves_in_agg);
first_ok_slave = NULL;
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) { bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
struct aggregator *agg = SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port.aggregator; agg = SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port.aggregator;
if (!agg || agg->aggregator_identifier != agg_id)
continue;
if (agg && (agg->aggregator_identifier == agg_id)) { if (slave_agg_no >= 0) {
if (!first_ok_slave && SLAVE_IS_OK(slave))
first_ok_slave = slave;
slave_agg_no--; slave_agg_no--;
if (slave_agg_no < 0) continue;
break; }
if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) {
res = bond_dev_queue_xmit(bond, skb, slave->dev);
goto out;
} }
} }
...@@ -2461,20 +2469,10 @@ int bond_3ad_xmit_xor(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) ...@@ -2461,20 +2469,10 @@ int bond_3ad_xmit_xor(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
goto out; goto out;
} }
start_at = slave; /* we couldn't find any suitable slave after the agg_no, so use the
* first suitable found, if found. */
bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, start_at) { if (first_ok_slave)
int slave_agg_id = 0; res = bond_dev_queue_xmit(bond, skb, first_ok_slave->dev);
struct aggregator *agg = SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port.aggregator;
if (agg)
slave_agg_id = agg->aggregator_identifier;
if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave) && agg && (slave_agg_id == agg_id)) {
res = bond_dev_queue_xmit(bond, skb, slave->dev);
break;
}
}
out: out:
read_unlock(&bond->lock); read_unlock(&bond->lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment