Commit c544d89b authored by Johannes Berg's avatar Johannes Berg Committed by Kalle Valo

iwlwifi: pcie: don't enable BHs with IRQs disabled

After the fix from Jiri that disabled local IRQs instead of
just BHs (necessary to fix an issue with submitting a command
with IRQs already disabled), there was still a situation in
which we could deep in there enable BHs, if the device config
sets the apmg_wake_up_wa configuration, which is true on all
7000 series devices.

To fix that, but not require reverting commit 1ed08f6f
("iwlwifi: remove flags argument for nic_access"), split up
nic access into a version with BH manipulation to use most
of the time, and without it for this specific case where the
local IRQs are already disabled.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210415164821.d0f2edda1651.I75f762e0bed38914d1300ea198b86dd449b4b206@changeid
parent fa84df70
......@@ -447,6 +447,11 @@ struct iwl_trans
const struct iwl_cfg_trans_params *cfg_trans);
void iwl_trans_pcie_free(struct iwl_trans *trans);
bool __iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access(struct iwl_trans *trans);
#define _iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access(trans) \
__cond_lock(nic_access_nobh, \
likely(__iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access(trans)))
/*****************************************************
* RX
******************************************************/
......
......@@ -1978,12 +1978,16 @@ static void iwl_trans_pcie_removal_wk(struct work_struct *wk)
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
}
static bool iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access(struct iwl_trans *trans)
/*
* This version doesn't disable BHs but rather assumes they're
* already disabled.
*/
bool __iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access(struct iwl_trans *trans)
{
int ret;
struct iwl_trans_pcie *trans_pcie = IWL_TRANS_GET_PCIE_TRANS(trans);
spin_lock_bh(&trans_pcie->reg_lock);
spin_lock(&trans_pcie->reg_lock);
if (trans_pcie->cmd_hold_nic_awake)
goto out;
......@@ -2068,7 +2072,7 @@ static bool iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access(struct iwl_trans *trans)
}
err:
spin_unlock_bh(&trans_pcie->reg_lock);
spin_unlock(&trans_pcie->reg_lock);
return false;
}
......@@ -2081,6 +2085,20 @@ static bool iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access(struct iwl_trans *trans)
return true;
}
static bool iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access(struct iwl_trans *trans)
{
bool ret;
local_bh_disable();
ret = __iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access(trans);
if (ret) {
/* keep BHs disabled until iwl_trans_pcie_release_nic_access */
return ret;
}
local_bh_enable();
return false;
}
static void iwl_trans_pcie_release_nic_access(struct iwl_trans *trans)
{
struct iwl_trans_pcie *trans_pcie = IWL_TRANS_GET_PCIE_TRANS(trans);
......
......@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ static int iwl_pcie_set_cmd_in_flight(struct iwl_trans *trans,
* returned. This needs to be done only on NICs that have
* apmg_wake_up_wa set (see above.)
*/
if (!iwl_trans_grab_nic_access(trans))
if (!_iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access(trans))
return -EIO;
/*
......@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ static int iwl_pcie_set_cmd_in_flight(struct iwl_trans *trans,
* already true, so it's OK to unconditionally set it to true.
*/
trans_pcie->cmd_hold_nic_awake = true;
spin_unlock_bh(&trans_pcie->reg_lock);
spin_unlock(&trans_pcie->reg_lock);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment