Commit c6cdcf6d authored by nikolay@redhat.com's avatar nikolay@redhat.com Committed by David S. Miller

bonding: fix locking in enslave failure path

In commit 3c5913b5 ("bonding:
primary_slave & curr_active_slave are not cleaned on enslave failure")
I didn't account for the use of curr_active_slave without curr_slave_lock
and since there are such users, we should hold bond->lock for writing while
setting it to NULL (in the NULL case we don't need the curr_slave_lock).
Keeping the bond lock as to avoid the extra release/acquire cycle.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent ecf01c22
...@@ -1915,14 +1915,16 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev) ...@@ -1915,14 +1915,16 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
bond_detach_slave(bond, new_slave); bond_detach_slave(bond, new_slave);
if (bond->primary_slave == new_slave) if (bond->primary_slave == new_slave)
bond->primary_slave = NULL; bond->primary_slave = NULL;
write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
if (bond->curr_active_slave == new_slave) { if (bond->curr_active_slave == new_slave) {
bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL);
write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
read_lock(&bond->lock); read_lock(&bond->lock);
write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL);
bond_select_active_slave(bond); bond_select_active_slave(bond);
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
read_unlock(&bond->lock); read_unlock(&bond->lock);
} else {
write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
} }
slave_disable_netpoll(new_slave); slave_disable_netpoll(new_slave);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment