Commit c818cc06 authored by Jiri Olsa's avatar Jiri Olsa Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf stat: Fix --interval_clear option

Currently we display extra header line, like:

  # perf stat -I 1000 -a --interval-clear
  #           time             counts unit events
         insn per cycle branch-misses of all branches
       2.964917103        3855.349912      cpu-clock (msec)          #    3.855 CPUs utilized
       2.964917103             23,993      context-switches          #    0.006 M/sec
       2.964917103              1,301      cpu-migrations            #    0.329 K/sec
       ...

Fixing the condition and getting proper:

  # perf stat -I 1000 -a --interval-clear
  #           time             counts unit events
       2.359048938        1432.492228      cpu-clock (msec)          #    1.432 CPUs utilized
       2.359048938              7,613      context-switches          #    0.002 M/sec
       2.359048938                419      cpu-migrations            #    0.133 K/sec
       ...
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Fixes: 9660e08e ("perf stat: Add --interval-clear option")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180702134202.17745-2-jolsa@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent a09603f8
...@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ static void print_interval(char *prefix, struct timespec *ts) ...@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ static void print_interval(char *prefix, struct timespec *ts)
} }
} }
if ((num_print_interval == 0 && metric_only) || interval_clear) if ((num_print_interval == 0 || interval_clear) && metric_only)
print_metric_headers(" ", true); print_metric_headers(" ", true);
if (++num_print_interval == 25) if (++num_print_interval == 25)
num_print_interval = 0; num_print_interval = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment