Commit c9ccaa0c authored by Tirupathi Reddy's avatar Tirupathi Reddy Committed by Mark Brown

regulator: core: fix a possible race in disable_work handling

A race condition between queueing and processing the disable_work
instances results in having a work instance in the queue and the
deferred_disables variable of regulator device structure having a
value '0'. If no new regulator_disable_deferred() call later from
clients, the deferred_disables variable value remains '0' and hits
BUG() in regulator_disable_work() when the queued instance scheduled
for processing the work.

The race occurs as below:

	Core-0					     Core-1
	.....	       /* deferred_disables = 2 */   .....
	.....	       /* disable_work is queued */  .....
	.....					     .....
regulator_disable_deferred: 		regulator_disable_work:
   mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);			     .....
   rdev->deferred_disables++;		             .....
   mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);			     .....
   queue_delayed_work(...)		    mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
	.....				    count =rdev->deferred_disables;
	.....				    rdev->deferred_disables = 0;
	.....					     .....
	.....				    mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
	.....					     .....
	.....				    return;
	.....					     .....
	/* No new regulator_disable_deferred() calls from clients */
	/* The newly queued instance is scheduled for processing */
	.....					     .....
regulator_disable_work:
	.....
   mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
   BUG_ON(!rdev->deferred_disables); /* deferred_disables = 0 */

The race is fixed by removing the work instance that is queued while
processing the previous queued instance. Cancel the newly queued instance
from disable_work() handler just after reset the deferred_disables variable
to value '0'. Also move the work queueing step before mutex_unlock in
regulator_disable_deferred().

Also use mod_delayed_work() in the pace of queue_delayed_work() as
queue_delayed_work() always uses the delay requested in the first call
when multiple consumers call regulator_disable_deferred() close in time
and does not guarantee the semantics of regulator_disable_deferred().
Signed-off-by: default avatarTirupathi Reddy <tirupath@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent 5771a8c0
......@@ -2396,6 +2396,14 @@ static void regulator_disable_work(struct work_struct *work)
count = rdev->deferred_disables;
rdev->deferred_disables = 0;
/*
* Workqueue functions queue the new work instance while the previous
* work instance is being processed. Cancel the queued work instance
* as the work instance under processing does the job of the queued
* work instance.
*/
cancel_delayed_work(&rdev->disable_work);
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
ret = _regulator_disable(rdev);
if (ret != 0)
......@@ -2439,10 +2447,10 @@ int regulator_disable_deferred(struct regulator *regulator, int ms)
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
rdev->deferred_disables++;
mod_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &rdev->disable_work,
msecs_to_jiffies(ms));
mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &rdev->disable_work,
msecs_to_jiffies(ms));
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_disable_deferred);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment