Commit ce23c47a authored by Dmitry Safonov's avatar Dmitry Safonov Committed by Linus Torvalds

m68k: add show_stack_loglvl()

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization.  It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side.  In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.  And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers.  Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.

Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by: default avatarDmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-18-dima@arista.comSigned-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent ffdac29e
...@@ -811,13 +811,13 @@ asmlinkage void buserr_c(struct frame *fp) ...@@ -811,13 +811,13 @@ asmlinkage void buserr_c(struct frame *fp)
static int kstack_depth_to_print = 48; static int kstack_depth_to_print = 48;
void show_trace(unsigned long *stack) static void show_trace(unsigned long *stack, const char *loglvl)
{ {
unsigned long *endstack; unsigned long *endstack;
unsigned long addr; unsigned long addr;
int i; int i;
pr_info("Call Trace:"); printk("%sCall Trace:", loglvl);
addr = (unsigned long)stack + THREAD_SIZE - 1; addr = (unsigned long)stack + THREAD_SIZE - 1;
endstack = (unsigned long *)(addr & -THREAD_SIZE); endstack = (unsigned long *)(addr & -THREAD_SIZE);
i = 0; i = 0;
...@@ -935,7 +935,8 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs) ...@@ -935,7 +935,8 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs)
pr_cont("\n"); pr_cont("\n");
} }
void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack) void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack,
const char *loglvl)
{ {
unsigned long *p; unsigned long *p;
unsigned long *endstack; unsigned long *endstack;
...@@ -949,7 +950,7 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack) ...@@ -949,7 +950,7 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
} }
endstack = (unsigned long *)(((unsigned long)stack + THREAD_SIZE - 1) & -THREAD_SIZE); endstack = (unsigned long *)(((unsigned long)stack + THREAD_SIZE - 1) & -THREAD_SIZE);
pr_info("Stack from %08lx:", (unsigned long)stack); printk("%sStack from %08lx:", loglvl, (unsigned long)stack);
p = stack; p = stack;
for (i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) { for (i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) {
if (p + 1 > endstack) if (p + 1 > endstack)
...@@ -959,7 +960,12 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack) ...@@ -959,7 +960,12 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
pr_cont(" %08lx", *p++); pr_cont(" %08lx", *p++);
} }
pr_cont("\n"); pr_cont("\n");
show_trace(stack); show_trace(stack, loglvl);
}
void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
{
show_stack_loglvl(task, stack, KERN_INFO);
} }
/* /*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment