Commit cf5bb09e authored by Jingbo Xu's avatar Jingbo Xu Committed by Christian Brauner

cachefiles: add missing lock protection when polling

Add missing lock protection in poll routine when iterating xarray,
otherwise:

Even with RCU read lock held, only the slot of the radix tree is
ensured to be pinned there, while the data structure (e.g. struct
cachefiles_req) stored in the slot has no such guarantee.  The poll
routine will iterate the radix tree and dereference cachefiles_req
accordingly.  Thus RCU read lock is not adequate in this case and
spinlock is needed here.

Fixes: b817e22b ("cachefiles: narrow the scope of triggering EPOLLIN events in ondemand mode")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBaokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-10-libaokun@huaweicloud.comAcked-by: default avatarJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarGao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
parent 19f4f399
......@@ -365,14 +365,14 @@ static __poll_t cachefiles_daemon_poll(struct file *file,
if (cachefiles_in_ondemand_mode(cache)) {
if (!xa_empty(&cache->reqs)) {
rcu_read_lock();
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_for_each_marked(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW) {
if (!cachefiles_ondemand_is_reopening_read(req)) {
mask |= EPOLLIN;
break;
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
xas_unlock(&xas);
}
} else {
if (test_bit(CACHEFILES_STATE_CHANGED, &cache->flags))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment