arm64: cpufeature: Fix CTR_EL0 field definitions

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840335

commit be68a8aa upstream.

Our field definitions for CTR_EL0 suffer from a number of problems:

  - The IDC and DIC fields are missing, which causes us to enable CTR
    trapping on CPUs with either of these returning non-zero values.

  - The ERG is FTR_LOWER_SAFE, whereas it should be treated like CWG as
    FTR_HIGHER_SAFE so that applications can use it to avoid false sharing.

  - [nit] A RES1 field is described as "RAO"

This patch updates the CTR_EL0 field definitions to fix these issues.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4.y only
Cc: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>

arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c

@@ -126,10 +126,12 @@ static struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64mmfr1[] = {
 };
 
 static struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = {
-	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 31, 1, 1),	/* RAO */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 28, 3, 0),
+	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 31, 1, 1),	/* RES1 */
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 30, 1, 0),
+	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 29, 1, 1),	/* DIC */
+	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 1, 1),	/* IDC */
 	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0),	/* CWG */
-	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),	/* ERG */
+	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),	/* ERG */
 	U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 1),	/* DminLine */
 	/*
 	 * Linux can handle differing I-cache policies. Userspace JITs will