Commit d0b2818e authored by Peter Oskolkov's avatar Peter Oskolkov Committed by Daniel Borkmann

bpf: fix a (false) compiler warning

An older GCC compiler complains:

kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function 'bpf_check':
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4***:13: error: 'prev_offset' may be used uninitialized
      in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
   } else if (krecord[i].insn_offset <= prev_offset) {
             ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4***:38: note: 'prev_offset' was declared here
  u32 i, nfuncs, urec_size, min_size, prev_offset;

Although the compiler is wrong here, the patch makes sure
that prev_offset is always initialized, just to silence the warning.

v2: fix a spelling error in the commit message.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
parent 4edc01b8
......@@ -4997,13 +4997,14 @@ static int check_btf_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
const union bpf_attr *attr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
{
u32 i, nfuncs, urec_size, min_size, prev_offset;
u32 i, nfuncs, urec_size, min_size;
u32 krec_size = sizeof(struct bpf_func_info);
struct bpf_func_info *krecord;
const struct btf_type *type;
struct bpf_prog *prog;
const struct btf *btf;
void __user *urecord;
u32 prev_offset = 0;
int ret = 0;
nfuncs = attr->func_info_cnt;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment