Commit d1b9e139 authored by Christian Marangi's avatar Christian Marangi Committed by Lee Jones

leds: trigger: netdev: Use mutex instead of spinlocks

Some LEDs may require to sleep while doing some operation like setting
brightness and other cleanup.

For this reason, using a spinlock will cause a sleep under spinlock
warning.

It should be safe to convert this to a sleepable lock since:
- sysfs read/write can sleep
- netdev_trig_work is a work queue and can sleep
- netdev _trig_notify can sleep

The spinlock was used when brightness didn't support sleeping, but this
changed and now it supported with brightness_set_blocking().

Convert to mutex lock to permit sleeping using brightness_set_blocking().
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230419210743.3594-6-ansuelsmth@gmail.com
parent 164b67d5
......@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
#include "../leds.h"
......@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
*/
struct led_netdev_data {
spinlock_t lock;
struct mutex lock;
struct delayed_work work;
struct notifier_block notifier;
......@@ -97,9 +97,9 @@ static ssize_t device_name_show(struct device *dev,
struct led_netdev_data *trigger_data = led_trigger_get_drvdata(dev);
ssize_t len;
spin_lock_bh(&trigger_data->lock);
mutex_lock(&trigger_data->lock);
len = sprintf(buf, "%s\n", trigger_data->device_name);
spin_unlock_bh(&trigger_data->lock);
mutex_unlock(&trigger_data->lock);
return len;
}
......@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static ssize_t device_name_store(struct device *dev,
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&trigger_data->work);
spin_lock_bh(&trigger_data->lock);
mutex_lock(&trigger_data->lock);
if (trigger_data->net_dev) {
dev_put(trigger_data->net_dev);
......@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static ssize_t device_name_store(struct device *dev,
trigger_data->last_activity = 0;
set_baseline_state(trigger_data);
spin_unlock_bh(&trigger_data->lock);
mutex_unlock(&trigger_data->lock);
return size;
}
......@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int netdev_trig_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&trigger_data->work);
spin_lock_bh(&trigger_data->lock);
mutex_lock(&trigger_data->lock);
trigger_data->carrier_link_up = false;
switch (evt) {
......@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int netdev_trig_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
set_baseline_state(trigger_data);
spin_unlock_bh(&trigger_data->lock);
mutex_unlock(&trigger_data->lock);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
......@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int netdev_trig_activate(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
if (!trigger_data)
return -ENOMEM;
spin_lock_init(&trigger_data->lock);
mutex_init(&trigger_data->lock);
trigger_data->notifier.notifier_call = netdev_trig_notify;
trigger_data->notifier.priority = 10;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment