Commit d380443c authored by Subhash Jadavani's avatar Subhash Jadavani Committed by Chris Ball

mmc: block: fix the data timeout issue with ACMD22

If multi block write operation fails for SD card, during
error handling we send the SD_APP_SEND_NUM_WR_BLKS (ACMD22)
to know how many blocks were already programmed by card.

But mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks() function which sends the ACMD22
calculates the data timeout value from csd.tacc_ns and
csd.tacc_clks parameters which will be 0 for block addressed
(>2GB cards) SD card. This would result in timeout_ns and
timeout_clks being 0 in the mmc_request passed to host driver.
This means host controller would program its data timeout timer
value with 0 which could result in DATA TIMEOUT errors from
controller.

To fix this issue, mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks() should instead
just call the mmc_set_data_timeout() to calculate the
data timeout value. mmc_set_data_timeout() function
ensures that non zero timeout value is set even for
block addressed SD cards.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSubhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVenkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
parent d1346a6c
......@@ -554,7 +554,6 @@ static u32 mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks(struct mmc_card *card)
struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL};
struct mmc_command cmd = {0};
struct mmc_data data = {0};
unsigned int timeout_us;
struct scatterlist sg;
......@@ -574,23 +573,12 @@ static u32 mmc_sd_num_wr_blocks(struct mmc_card *card)
cmd.arg = 0;
cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;
data.timeout_ns = card->csd.tacc_ns * 100;
data.timeout_clks = card->csd.tacc_clks * 100;
timeout_us = data.timeout_ns / 1000;
timeout_us += data.timeout_clks * 1000 /
(card->host->ios.clock / 1000);
if (timeout_us > 100000) {
data.timeout_ns = 100000000;
data.timeout_clks = 0;
}
data.blksz = 4;
data.blocks = 1;
data.flags = MMC_DATA_READ;
data.sg = &sg;
data.sg_len = 1;
mmc_set_data_timeout(&data, card);
mrq.cmd = &cmd;
mrq.data = &data;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment