Commit d40f9202 authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

workqueue: The default node_nr_active should have its max set to max_active

The default nna (node_nr_active) is used when the pool isn't tied to a
specific NUMA node. This can happen in the following cases:

 1. On NUMA, if per-node pwq init failure and the fallback pwq is used.
 2. On NUMA, if a pool is configured to span multiple nodes.
 3. On single node setups.

5797b1c1 ("workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for
unbound workqueues") set the default nna->max to min_active because only #1
was being considered. For #2 and #3, using min_active means that the max
concurrency in normal operation is pushed down to min_active which is
currently 8, which can obviously lead to performance issues.

exact value nna->max is set to doesn't really matter. #2 can only happen if
the workqueue is intentionally configured to ignore NUMA boundaries and
there's no good way to distribute max_active in this case. #3 is the default
behavior on single node machines.

Let's set it the default nna->max to max_active. This fixes the artificially
lowered concurrency problem on single node machines and shouldn't hurt
anything for other cases.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: default avatarShinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Fixes: 5797b1c1 ("workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dm-devel/20240410084531.2134621-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com/Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
parent 57a01eaf
......@@ -1610,7 +1610,7 @@ static void wq_update_node_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int off_cpu)
min_active, max_active);
}
wq_node_nr_active(wq, NUMA_NO_NODE)->max = min_active;
wq_node_nr_active(wq, NUMA_NO_NODE)->max = max_active;
}
/**
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment