Commit d4203bda authored by Dave Chinner's avatar Dave Chinner Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

xfs: Don't flush stale inodes

commit 44e08c45 upstream

Because inodes remain in cache much longer than inode buffers do
under memory pressure, we can get the situation where we have
stale, dirty inodes being reclaimed but the backing storage has
been freed.  Hence we should never, ever flush XFS_ISTALE inodes
to disk as there is no guarantee that the backing buffer is in
cache and still marked stale when the flush occurs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
parent 8ae95bb9
......@@ -2877,10 +2877,14 @@ xfs_iflush(
mp = ip->i_mount;
/*
* If the inode isn't dirty, then just release the inode
* flush lock and do nothing.
* If the inode isn't dirty, then just release the inode flush lock and
* do nothing. Treat stale inodes the same; we cannot rely on the
* backing buffer remaining stale in cache for the remaining life of
* the stale inode and so xfs_itobp() below may give us a buffer that
* no longer contains inodes below. Doing this stale check here also
* avoids forcing the log on pinned, stale inodes.
*/
if (xfs_inode_clean(ip)) {
if (xfs_inode_clean(ip) || xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE)) {
xfs_ifunlock(ip);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment