Commit d4e935bd authored by J. Bruce Fields's avatar J. Bruce Fields Committed by Trond Myklebust

The rpc server does not require that service threads take the BKL.

Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
parent 96f287b0
......@@ -78,11 +78,6 @@ nfs4_callback_svc(void *vrqstp)
set_freezable();
/*
* FIXME: do we really need to run this under the BKL? If so, please
* add a comment about what it's intended to protect.
*/
lock_kernel();
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
/*
* Listen for a request on the socket
......@@ -104,7 +99,6 @@ nfs4_callback_svc(void *vrqstp)
preverr = err;
svc_process(rqstp);
}
unlock_kernel();
return 0;
}
......@@ -160,11 +154,6 @@ nfs41_callback_svc(void *vrqstp)
set_freezable();
/*
* FIXME: do we really need to run this under the BKL? If so, please
* add a comment about what it's intended to protect.
*/
lock_kernel();
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
prepare_to_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_cb_lock);
......@@ -183,7 +172,6 @@ nfs41_callback_svc(void *vrqstp)
}
finish_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq);
}
unlock_kernel();
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment