Commit d6507cf1 authored by Nikolay Borisov's avatar Nikolay Borisov Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: Remove fs_info from btrfs_assign_next_active_device

It can be referenced from the passed 'device' argument which is always
a well-formed device.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 5495f195
...@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static int btrfs_dev_replace_finishing(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, ...@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static int btrfs_dev_replace_finishing(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
tgt_device->commit_total_bytes = src_device->commit_total_bytes; tgt_device->commit_total_bytes = src_device->commit_total_bytes;
tgt_device->commit_bytes_used = src_device->bytes_used; tgt_device->commit_bytes_used = src_device->bytes_used;
btrfs_assign_next_active_device(fs_info, src_device, tgt_device); btrfs_assign_next_active_device(src_device, tgt_device);
list_add(&tgt_device->dev_alloc_list, &fs_info->fs_devices->alloc_list); list_add(&tgt_device->dev_alloc_list, &fs_info->fs_devices->alloc_list);
fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices++; fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices++;
......
...@@ -1833,9 +1833,10 @@ static struct btrfs_device * btrfs_find_next_active_device( ...@@ -1833,9 +1833,10 @@ static struct btrfs_device * btrfs_find_next_active_device(
* where this function called, there should be always be another device (or * where this function called, there should be always be another device (or
* this_dev) which is active. * this_dev) which is active.
*/ */
void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_device *device,
struct btrfs_device *device, struct btrfs_device *this_dev) struct btrfs_device *this_dev)
{ {
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = device->fs_info;
struct btrfs_device *next_device; struct btrfs_device *next_device;
if (this_dev) if (this_dev)
...@@ -1945,7 +1946,7 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path, ...@@ -1945,7 +1946,7 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path,
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING, &device->dev_state)) if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING, &device->dev_state))
cur_devices->missing_devices--; cur_devices->missing_devices--;
btrfs_assign_next_active_device(fs_info, device, NULL); btrfs_assign_next_active_device(device, NULL);
if (device->bdev) { if (device->bdev) {
cur_devices->open_devices--; cur_devices->open_devices--;
...@@ -2077,7 +2078,7 @@ void btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, ...@@ -2077,7 +2078,7 @@ void btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
fs_devices->num_devices--; fs_devices->num_devices--;
btrfs_assign_next_active_device(fs_info, tgtdev, NULL); btrfs_assign_next_active_device(tgtdev, NULL);
list_del_rcu(&tgtdev->dev_list); list_del_rcu(&tgtdev->dev_list);
......
...@@ -407,8 +407,8 @@ struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, ...@@ -407,8 +407,8 @@ struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
fmode_t flags, void *holder); fmode_t flags, void *holder);
int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices); int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
void btrfs_free_extra_devids(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int step); void btrfs_free_extra_devids(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int step);
void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_device *device,
struct btrfs_device *device, struct btrfs_device *this_dev); struct btrfs_device *this_dev);
int btrfs_find_device_missing_or_by_path(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int btrfs_find_device_missing_or_by_path(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
const char *device_path, const char *device_path,
struct btrfs_device **device); struct btrfs_device **device);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment