Commit d654976c authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by David S. Miller

tcp: fix a potential deadlock in tcp_get_info()

Taking socket spinlock in tcp_get_info() can deadlock, as
inet_diag_dump_icsk() holds the &hashinfo->ehash_locks[i],
while packet processing can use the reverse locking order.

We could avoid this locking for TCP_LISTEN states, but lockdep would
certainly get confused as all TCP sockets share same lockdep classes.

[  523.722504] ======================================================
[  523.728706] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[  523.734990] 4.1.0-dbg-DEV #1676 Not tainted
[  523.739202] -------------------------------------------------------
[  523.745474] ss/18032 is trying to acquire lock:
[  523.750002]  (slock-AF_INET){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81669d44>] tcp_get_info+0x2c4/0x360
[  523.758129]
[  523.758129] but task is already holding lock:
[  523.763968]  (&(&hashinfo->ehash_locks[i])->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff816bcb75>] inet_diag_dump_icsk+0x1d5/0x6c0
[  523.774661]
[  523.774661] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[  523.774661]
[  523.782850]
[  523.782850] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  523.790326]
-> #1 (&(&hashinfo->ehash_locks[i])->rlock){+.-...}:
[  523.796599]        [<ffffffff811126bb>] lock_acquire+0xbb/0x270
[  523.802565]        [<ffffffff816f5868>] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50
[  523.808628]        [<ffffffff81665af8>] __inet_hash_nolisten+0x78/0x110
[  523.815273]        [<ffffffff816819db>] tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock+0x24b/0x350
[  523.822067]        [<ffffffff81684d41>] tcp_check_req+0x3c1/0x500
[  523.828199]        [<ffffffff81682d09>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x239/0x3d0
[  523.834331]        [<ffffffff816842fe>] tcp_v4_rcv+0xa8e/0xc10
[  523.840202]        [<ffffffff81658fa3>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x133/0x3e0
[  523.847214]        [<ffffffff81659a9a>] ip_local_deliver+0xaa/0xc0
[  523.853440]        [<ffffffff816593b8>] ip_rcv_finish+0x168/0x5c0
[  523.859624]        [<ffffffff81659db7>] ip_rcv+0x307/0x420

Lets use u64_sync infrastructure instead. As a bonus, 64bit
arches get optimized, as these are nop for them.

Fixes: 0df48c26 ("tcp: add tcpi_bytes_acked to tcp_info")
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent c78e1746
......@@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ struct tcp_sock {
* sum(delta(snd_una)), or how many bytes
* were acked.
*/
struct u64_stats_sync syncp; /* protects 64bit vars (cf tcp_get_info()) */
u32 snd_una; /* First byte we want an ack for */
u32 snd_sml; /* Last byte of the most recently transmitted small packet */
u32 rcv_tstamp; /* timestamp of last received ACK (for keepalives) */
......
......@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ void tcp_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
tp->snd_ssthresh = TCP_INFINITE_SSTHRESH;
tp->snd_cwnd_clamp = ~0;
tp->mss_cache = TCP_MSS_DEFAULT;
u64_stats_init(&tp->syncp);
tp->reordering = sysctl_tcp_reordering;
tcp_enable_early_retrans(tp);
......@@ -2598,6 +2599,7 @@ void tcp_get_info(struct sock *sk, struct tcp_info *info)
const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
u32 now = tcp_time_stamp;
unsigned int start;
u32 rate;
memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
......@@ -2665,10 +2667,11 @@ void tcp_get_info(struct sock *sk, struct tcp_info *info)
rate = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_max_pacing_rate);
info->tcpi_max_pacing_rate = rate != ~0U ? rate : ~0ULL;
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
info->tcpi_bytes_acked = tp->bytes_acked;
info->tcpi_bytes_received = tp->bytes_received;
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
do {
start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&tp->syncp);
info->tcpi_bytes_acked = tp->bytes_acked;
info->tcpi_bytes_received = tp->bytes_received;
} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&tp->syncp, start));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_get_info);
......
......@@ -206,6 +206,10 @@ static bool tcp_fastopen_create_child(struct sock *sk,
skb_set_owner_r(skb2, child);
__skb_queue_tail(&child->sk_receive_queue, skb2);
tp->syn_data_acked = 1;
/* u64_stats_update_begin(&tp->syncp) not needed here,
* as we certainly are not changing upper 32bit value (0)
*/
tp->bytes_received = end_seq - TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq - 1;
} else {
end_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + 1;
......
......@@ -3286,7 +3286,9 @@ static void tcp_snd_una_update(struct tcp_sock *tp, u32 ack)
{
u32 delta = ack - tp->snd_una;
u64_stats_update_begin(&tp->syncp);
tp->bytes_acked += delta;
u64_stats_update_end(&tp->syncp);
tp->snd_una = ack;
}
......@@ -3295,7 +3297,9 @@ static void tcp_rcv_nxt_update(struct tcp_sock *tp, u32 seq)
{
u32 delta = seq - tp->rcv_nxt;
u64_stats_update_begin(&tp->syncp);
tp->bytes_received += delta;
u64_stats_update_end(&tp->syncp);
tp->rcv_nxt = seq;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment