Commit d7924e6f authored by Vedang Patel's avatar Vedang Patel Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

igb: clear out skb->tstamp after reading the txtime

[ Upstream commit 1e08511d ]

If a packet which is utilizing the launchtime feature (via SO_TXTIME socket
option) also requests the hardware transmit timestamp, the hardware
timestamp is not delivered to the userspace. This is because the value in
skb->tstamp is mistaken as the software timestamp.

Applications, like ptp4l, request a hardware timestamp by setting the
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE socket option. Whenever a new timestamp is
detected by the driver (this work is done in igb_ptp_tx_work() which calls
igb_ptp_tx_hwtstamps() in igb_ptp.c[1]), it will queue the timestamp in the
ERR_QUEUE for the userspace to read. When the userspace is ready, it will
issue a recvmsg() call to collect this timestamp.  The problem is in this
recvmsg() call. If the skb->tstamp is not cleared out, it will be
interpreted as a software timestamp and the hardware tx timestamp will not
be successfully sent to the userspace. Look at skb_is_swtx_tstamp() and the
callee function __sock_recv_timestamp() in net/socket.c for more details.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVedang Patel <vedang.patel@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarAaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent aa6a8b84
...@@ -5687,6 +5687,7 @@ static void igb_tx_ctxtdesc(struct igb_ring *tx_ring, ...@@ -5687,6 +5687,7 @@ static void igb_tx_ctxtdesc(struct igb_ring *tx_ring,
*/ */
if (tx_ring->launchtime_enable) { if (tx_ring->launchtime_enable) {
ts = ns_to_timespec64(first->skb->tstamp); ts = ns_to_timespec64(first->skb->tstamp);
first->skb->tstamp = 0;
context_desc->seqnum_seed = cpu_to_le32(ts.tv_nsec / 32); context_desc->seqnum_seed = cpu_to_le32(ts.tv_nsec / 32);
} else { } else {
context_desc->seqnum_seed = 0; context_desc->seqnum_seed = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment