Commit d7a3e3ec authored by David R. Piegdon's avatar David R. Piegdon Committed by Ben Hutchings

ARM: OMAP2+: Fix parser-bug in platform muxing code

commit c021f241 upstream.

Fix a parser-bug in the omap2 muxing code where muxtable-entries will be
wrongly selected if the requested muxname is a *prefix* of their
m0-entry and they have a matching mN-entry. Fix by additionally checking
that the length of the m0_entry is equal.

For example muxing of "dss_data2.dss_data2" on omap32xx will fail
because the prefix "dss_data2" will match the mux-entries "dss_data2" as
well as "dss_data20", with the suffix "dss_data2" matching m0 (for
dss_data2) and m4 (for dss_data20). Thus both are recognized as signal
path candidates:

Relevant muxentries from mux34xx.c:
        _OMAP3_MUXENTRY(DSS_DATA20, 90,
                "dss_data20", NULL, "mcspi3_somi", "dss_data2",
                "gpio_90", NULL, NULL, "safe_mode"),
        _OMAP3_MUXENTRY(DSS_DATA2, 72,
                "dss_data2", NULL, NULL, NULL,
                "gpio_72", NULL, NULL, "safe_mode"),

This will result in a failure to mux the pin at all:

 _omap_mux_get_by_name: Multiple signal paths (2) for dss_data2.dss_data2

Patch should apply to linus' latest master down to rather old linux-2.6
trees.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid R. Piegdon <lkml@p23q.org>
[tony@atomide.com: updated description to include full description]
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
parent 3d4a1eea
......@@ -182,8 +182,10 @@ static int __init _omap_mux_get_by_name(struct omap_mux_partition *partition,
m0_entry = mux->muxnames[0];
/* First check for full name in mode0.muxmode format */
if (mode0_len && strncmp(muxname, m0_entry, mode0_len))
continue;
if (mode0_len)
if (strncmp(muxname, m0_entry, mode0_len) ||
(strlen(m0_entry) != mode0_len))
continue;
/* Then check for muxmode only */
for (i = 0; i < OMAP_MUX_NR_MODES; i++) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment