KVM: arm64: Add support for KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL

In anticipation of user hypercall filters, add the necessary plumbing to
get SMCCC calls out to userspace. Even though the exit structure has
space for KVM to pass register arguments, let's just avoid it altogether
and let userspace poke at the registers via KVM_GET_ONE_REG.

This deliberately stretches the definition of a 'hypercall' to cover
SMCs from EL1 in addition to the HVCs we know and love. KVM doesn't
support EL1 calls into secure services, but now we can paint that as a
userspace problem and be done with it.

Finally, we need a flag to let userspace know what conduit instruction
was used (i.e. SMC vs. HVC).
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404154050.2270077-9-oliver.upton@linux.dev

Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst

@@ -6221,11 +6221,25 @@ to the byte array.
 			__u64 flags;
 		} hypercall;
 
-Unused.  This was once used for 'hypercall to userspace'.  To implement
-such functionality, use KVM_EXIT_IO (x86) or KVM_EXIT_MMIO (all except s390).
+
+It is strongly recommended that userspace use ``KVM_EXIT_IO`` (x86) or
+``KVM_EXIT_MMIO`` (all except s390) to implement functionality that
+requires a guest to interact with host userpace.
 
 .. note:: KVM_EXIT_IO is significantly faster than KVM_EXIT_MMIO.
 
+For arm64:
+----------
+
+``nr`` contains the function ID of the guest's SMCCC call. Userspace is
+expected to use the ``KVM_GET_ONE_REG`` ioctl to retrieve the call
+parameters from the vCPU's GPRs.
+
+Definition of ``flags``:
+ - ``KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC``: Indicates that the guest used the SMC
+   conduit to initiate the SMCCC call. If this bit is 0 then the guest
+   used the HVC conduit for the SMCCC call.
+
 ::
 
 		/* KVM_EXIT_TPR_ACCESS */

arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h

@@ -472,12 +472,16 @@ enum {
 enum kvm_smccc_filter_action {
 	KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_HANDLE = 0,
 	KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_DENY,
+	KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_FWD_TO_USER,
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 	NR_SMCCC_FILTER_ACTIONS
 #endif
 };
 
+/* arm64-specific KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL flags */
+#define KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC	(1U << 0)
+
 #endif
 
 #endif /* __ARM_KVM_H__ */

arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c

@@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 * Trap exception, not a Secure Monitor Call exception [...]"
 	 *
 	 * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
-	 * otherwise return to the same address...
+	 * otherwise return to the same address. Furthermore, pre-incrementing
+	 * the PC before potentially exiting to userspace maintains the same
+	 * abstraction for both SMCs and HVCs.
 	 */
 	kvm_incr_pc(vcpu);
 

arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c

@@ -180,6 +180,19 @@ static u8 kvm_smccc_get_action(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 func_id)
 	return KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_DENY;
 }
 
+static void kvm_prepare_hypercall_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 func_id)
+{
+	u8 ec = ESR_ELx_EC(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu));
+	struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+
+	run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
+	run->hypercall.nr = func_id;
+	run->hypercall.flags = 0;
+
+	if (ec == ESR_ELx_EC_SMC32 || ec == ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64)
+		run->hypercall.flags |= KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC;
+}
+
 int kvm_smccc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_smccc_features *smccc_feat = &vcpu->kvm->arch.smccc_feat;
@@ -195,6 +208,9 @@ int kvm_smccc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		break;
 	case KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_DENY:
 		goto out;
+	case KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_FWD_TO_USER:
+		kvm_prepare_hypercall_exit(vcpu, func_id);
+		return 0;
 	default:
 		WARN_RATELIMIT(1, "Unhandled SMCCC filter action: %d\n", action);
 		goto out;