Commit d8db5234 authored by Matt Redfearn's avatar Matt Redfearn Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

virtio: console: Unlock vqs while freeing buffers

commit 34563769 upstream.

Commit c6017e79 ("virtio: console: add locks around buffer removal
in port unplug path") added locking around the freeing of buffers in the
vq. However, when free_buf() is called with can_sleep = true and rproc
is enabled, it calls dma_free_coherent() directly, requiring interrupts
to be enabled. Currently a WARNING is triggered due to the spin locking
around free_buf, with a call stack like this:

WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 121 at ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:433
free_buf+0x1a8/0x288
Call Trace:
[<8040c538>] show_stack+0x74/0xc0
[<80757240>] dump_stack+0xd0/0x110
[<80430d98>] __warn+0xfc/0x130
[<80430ee0>] warn_slowpath_null+0x2c/0x3c
[<807e7c6c>] free_buf+0x1a8/0x288
[<807ea590>] remove_port_data+0x50/0xac
[<807ea6a0>] unplug_port+0xb4/0x1bc
[<807ea858>] virtcons_remove+0xb0/0xfc
[<807b6734>] virtio_dev_remove+0x58/0xc0
[<807f918c>] __device_release_driver+0xac/0x134
[<807f924c>] device_release_driver+0x38/0x50
[<807f7edc>] bus_remove_device+0xfc/0x130
[<807f4b74>] device_del+0x17c/0x21c
[<807f4c38>] device_unregister+0x24/0x38
[<807b6b50>] unregister_virtio_device+0x28/0x44

Fix this by restructuring the loops to allow the locks to only be taken
where it is necessary to protect the vqs, and release it while the
buffer is being freed.

Fixes: c6017e79 ("virtio: console: add locks around buffer removal in port unplug path")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 7569d22a
...@@ -1540,19 +1540,29 @@ static void remove_port_data(struct port *port) ...@@ -1540,19 +1540,29 @@ static void remove_port_data(struct port *port)
spin_lock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock); spin_lock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
/* Remove unused data this port might have received. */ /* Remove unused data this port might have received. */
discard_port_data(port); discard_port_data(port);
spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
/* Remove buffers we queued up for the Host to send us data in. */ /* Remove buffers we queued up for the Host to send us data in. */
while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->in_vq))) do {
free_buf(buf, true); spin_lock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock); buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->in_vq);
spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
if (buf)
free_buf(buf, true);
} while (buf);
spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
reclaim_consumed_buffers(port); reclaim_consumed_buffers(port);
spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
/* Free pending buffers from the out-queue. */ /* Free pending buffers from the out-queue. */
while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->out_vq))) do {
free_buf(buf, true); spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->out_vq);
spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
if (buf)
free_buf(buf, true);
} while (buf);
} }
/* /*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment