Commit d9494cb4 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

perf: Remove useless atomic_t

There's nothing atomic about atomic_set vs atomic_read; so remove the
atomic_t usage.

Also, make running_sample_length static as it really is (and should
be) local to this translation unit.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: jmario@redhat.com
Cc: acme@infradead.org
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-vw9lg588x1ic248whybjon0c@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent aac89854
......@@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ int sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate __read_mostly = DEFAULT_MAX_SAMPLE_RATE;
static int max_samples_per_tick __read_mostly = DIV_ROUND_UP(DEFAULT_MAX_SAMPLE_RATE, HZ);
static int perf_sample_period_ns __read_mostly = DEFAULT_SAMPLE_PERIOD_NS;
static atomic_t perf_sample_allowed_ns __read_mostly =
ATOMIC_INIT( DEFAULT_SAMPLE_PERIOD_NS * DEFAULT_CPU_TIME_MAX_PERCENT / 100);
static int perf_sample_allowed_ns __read_mostly =
DEFAULT_SAMPLE_PERIOD_NS * DEFAULT_CPU_TIME_MAX_PERCENT / 100;
void update_perf_cpu_limits(void)
{
......@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ void update_perf_cpu_limits(void)
tmp *= sysctl_perf_cpu_time_max_percent;
do_div(tmp, 100);
atomic_set(&perf_sample_allowed_ns, tmp);
ACCESS_ONCE(perf_sample_allowed_ns) = tmp;
}
static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx);
......@@ -228,14 +228,15 @@ int perf_cpu_time_max_percent_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
* we detect that events are taking too long.
*/
#define NR_ACCUMULATED_SAMPLES 128
DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, running_sample_length);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, running_sample_length);
void perf_sample_event_took(u64 sample_len_ns)
{
u64 avg_local_sample_len;
u64 local_samples_len;
u64 allowed_ns = ACCESS_ONCE(perf_sample_allowed_ns);
if (atomic_read(&perf_sample_allowed_ns) == 0)
if (allowed_ns == 0)
return;
/* decay the counter by 1 average sample */
......@@ -251,7 +252,7 @@ void perf_sample_event_took(u64 sample_len_ns)
*/
avg_local_sample_len = local_samples_len/NR_ACCUMULATED_SAMPLES;
if (avg_local_sample_len <= atomic_read(&perf_sample_allowed_ns))
if (avg_local_sample_len <= allowed_ns)
return;
if (max_samples_per_tick <= 1)
......@@ -262,10 +263,9 @@ void perf_sample_event_took(u64 sample_len_ns)
perf_sample_period_ns = NSEC_PER_SEC / sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate;
printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
"perf samples too long (%lld > %d), lowering "
"perf samples too long (%lld > %lld), lowering "
"kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to %d\n",
avg_local_sample_len,
atomic_read(&perf_sample_allowed_ns),
avg_local_sample_len, allowed_ns,
sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate);
update_perf_cpu_limits();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment