Commit d98654a7 authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller

Merge branch 'mvneta-fixes'

Gregory CLEMENT says:

====================
Few mvneta fixes

In this second version I split the last patch in two parts as
requested.

For the record the initial cover letter was:
"here is a patch set of few fixes. Without the first one, a kernel
configured with debug features ended to hang when the driver is built
as a module and is removed. This is quite is annoying for debugging!

The second patch fix a forgotten flag at the initial submission of the
driver.

The third patch is only really a cosmetic one so I have no problem to
not apply it for 4.5 and wait for 4.6.

I really would like to see the first one applied for 4.5 and for the
second I let you judge if it something needed for now or that should
wait the next release."
====================
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parents 8626c56c a3703fb3
......@@ -1107,14 +1107,14 @@ static void mvneta_port_down(struct mvneta_port *pp)
do {
if (count++ >= MVNETA_RX_DISABLE_TIMEOUT_MSEC) {
netdev_warn(pp->dev,
"TIMEOUT for RX stopped ! rx_queue_cmd: 0x08%x\n",
"TIMEOUT for RX stopped ! rx_queue_cmd: 0x%08x\n",
val);
break;
}
mdelay(1);
val = mvreg_read(pp, MVNETA_RXQ_CMD);
} while (val & 0xff);
} while (val & MVNETA_RXQ_ENABLE_MASK);
/* Stop Tx port activity. Check port Tx activity. Issue stop
* command for active channels only
......@@ -1139,14 +1139,14 @@ static void mvneta_port_down(struct mvneta_port *pp)
/* Check TX Command reg that all Txqs are stopped */
val = mvreg_read(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_CMD);
} while (val & 0xff);
} while (val & MVNETA_TXQ_ENABLE_MASK);
/* Double check to verify that TX FIFO is empty */
count = 0;
do {
if (count++ >= MVNETA_TX_FIFO_EMPTY_TIMEOUT) {
netdev_warn(pp->dev,
"TX FIFO empty timeout status=0x08%x\n",
"TX FIFO empty timeout status=0x%08x\n",
val);
break;
}
......@@ -3480,17 +3480,17 @@ static int mvneta_stop(struct net_device *dev)
struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
/* Inform that we are stopping so we don't want to setup the
* driver for new CPUs in the notifiers
* driver for new CPUs in the notifiers. The code of the
* notifier for CPU online is protected by the same spinlock,
* so when we get the lock, the notifer work is done.
*/
spin_lock(&pp->lock);
pp->is_stopped = true;
spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
mvneta_stop_dev(pp);
mvneta_mdio_remove(pp);
unregister_cpu_notifier(&pp->cpu_notifier);
/* Now that the notifier are unregistered, we can release le
* lock
*/
spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
on_each_cpu(mvneta_percpu_disable, pp, true);
free_percpu_irq(dev->irq, pp->ports);
mvneta_cleanup_rxqs(pp);
......@@ -4023,6 +4023,7 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev->ethtool_ops = &mvneta_eth_tool_ops;
pp = netdev_priv(dev);
spin_lock_init(&pp->lock);
pp->phy_node = phy_node;
pp->phy_interface = phy_mode;
......@@ -4144,7 +4145,7 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev->features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO;
dev->hw_features |= dev->features;
dev->vlan_features |= dev->features;
dev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT;
dev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT | IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE;
dev->gso_max_segs = MVNETA_MAX_TSO_SEGS;
err = register_netdev(dev);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment