Commit ddb595df authored by Al Viro's avatar Al Viro Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

cachefiles: fix the race between cachefiles_bury_object() and rmdir(2)

commit 169b8033 upstream.

the victim might've been rmdir'ed just before the lock_rename();
unlike the normal callers, we do not look the source up after the
parents are locked - we know it beforehand and just recheck that it's
still the child of what used to be its parent.  Unfortunately,
the check is too weak - we don't spot a dead directory since its
->d_parent is unchanged, dentry is positive, etc.  So we sail all
the way to ->rename(), with hosting filesystems _not_ expecting
to be asked renaming an rmdir'ed subdirectory.

The fix is easy, fortunately - the lock on parent is sufficient for
making IS_DEADDIR() on child safe.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 9ae326a6 (CacheFiles: A cache that backs onto a mounted filesystem)
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 33e52eb2
......@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int cachefiles_bury_object(struct cachefiles_cache *cache,
trap = lock_rename(cache->graveyard, dir);
/* do some checks before getting the grave dentry */
if (rep->d_parent != dir) {
if (rep->d_parent != dir || IS_DEADDIR(d_inode(rep))) {
/* the entry was probably culled when we dropped the parent dir
* lock */
unlock_rename(cache->graveyard, dir);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment