Commit de985dd5 authored by Dmitry Safonov's avatar Dmitry Safonov Committed by Linus Torvalds

unicore32: add loglvl to c_backtrace()

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization.  It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side.  In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.  And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers.  Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.

Add log level parameter to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing
show_stack_loglvl()

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by: default avatarDmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-39-dima@arista.comSigned-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent ee1e9900
......@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ extern void kernel_thread_helper(void);
extern void __init early_signal_init(void);
extern asmlinkage void __backtrace(void);
extern asmlinkage void c_backtrace(unsigned long fp);
extern asmlinkage void c_backtrace(unsigned long fp, const char *loglvl);
extern void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
......
......@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
printk("\n");
if (ok)
c_backtrace(fp);
c_backtrace(fp, KERN_DEFAULT);
}
void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
......
......@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#define sv_fp v5
#define sv_pc v6
#define offset v8
#define loglvl v9
ENTRY(__backtrace)
mov r0, fp
......@@ -27,10 +28,11 @@ ENTRY(c_backtrace)
ENDPROC(__backtrace)
ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
#else
stm.w (v4 - v8, lr), [sp-] @ Save an extra register
stm.w (v4 - v10, lr), [sp-] @ Save an extra register
@ so we have a location...
mov.a frame, r0 @ if frame pointer is zero
beq no_frame @ we have no stack frames
mov loglvl, r1
1: stm.w (pc), [sp-] @ calculate offset of PC stored
ldw.w r0, [sp]+, #4 @ by stmfd for this CPU
......@@ -95,9 +97,10 @@ for_each_frame:
bua for_each_frame
1006: adr r0, .Lbad
mov r1, frame
mov r1, loglvl
mov r2, frame
b.l printk
no_frame: ldm.w (v4 - v8, pc), [sp]+
no_frame: ldm.w (v4 - v10, pc), [sp]+
ENDPROC(__backtrace)
ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
......@@ -128,8 +131,11 @@ ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
add v7, v7, #1
cxor.a v7, #6
cmoveq v7, #1
cmoveq r1, #'\n'
cmovne r1, #' '
bne 201f
adr r0, .Lcr
mov r1, loglvl
b.l printk
201:
ldw.w r3, [stack]+, #-4
mov r2, reg
csub.a r2, #8
......@@ -141,18 +147,20 @@ ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
add r2, r2, #0x10 @ so r2 need add 16
201:
adr r0, .Lfp
mov r1, loglvl
b.l printk
2: sub.a reg, reg, #1
bns 1b
cxor.a v7, #0
beq 201f
adr r0, .Lcr
mov r1, loglvl
b.l printk
201: ldm.w (instr, reg, stack, v7, pc), [sp]+
.Lfp: .asciz "%cr%d:%08x"
.Lcr: .asciz "\n"
.Lbad: .asciz "Backtrace aborted due to bad frame pointer <%p>\n"
.Lfp: .asciz "%sr%d:%08x "
.Lcr: .asciz "%s\n"
.Lbad: .asciz "%sBacktrace aborted due to bad frame pointer <%p>\n"
.align
.Ldsi: .word 0x92eec000 >> 14 @ stm.w sp, (... fp, ip, lr, pc)
.word 0x92e10000 >> 14 @ stm.w sp, ()
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment