Commit df08126e authored by Jason A. Donenfeld's avatar Jason A. Donenfeld Committed by David S. Miller

wireguard: receive: account for napi_gro_receive never returning GRO_DROP

The napi_gro_receive function no longer returns GRO_DROP ever, making
handling GRO_DROP dead code. This commit removes that dead code.
Further, it's not even clear that device drivers have any business in
taking action after passing off received packets; that's arguably out of
their hands.

Fixes: e7096c13 ("net: WireGuard secure network tunnel")
Fixes: 6570bc79 ("net: core: use listified Rx for GRO_NORMAL in napi_gro_receive()")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent b18e9834
......@@ -414,14 +414,8 @@ static void wg_packet_consume_data_done(struct wg_peer *peer,
if (unlikely(routed_peer != peer))
goto dishonest_packet_peer;
if (unlikely(napi_gro_receive(&peer->napi, skb) == GRO_DROP)) {
++dev->stats.rx_dropped;
net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: Failed to give packet to userspace from peer %llu (%pISpfsc)\n",
dev->name, peer->internal_id,
&peer->endpoint.addr);
} else {
update_rx_stats(peer, message_data_len(len_before_trim));
}
napi_gro_receive(&peer->napi, skb);
update_rx_stats(peer, message_data_len(len_before_trim));
return;
dishonest_packet_peer:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment