Commit dffa9153 authored by Oliver O'Halloran's avatar Oliver O'Halloran Committed by Michael Ellerman

powerpc/eeh: Move vf_index out of pci_dn and into eeh_dev

Drivers that do not support the PCI error handling callbacks are handled by
tearing down the device and re-probing them. If the device being removed is
a virtual function then we need to know the VF index so it can be removed
using the pci_iov_{add|remove}_virtfn() API.

Currently this is handled by looking up the pci_dn, and using the vf_index
that was stashed there when the pci_dn for the VF was created in
pcibios_sriov_enable(). We would like to eliminate the use of pci_dn
outside of pseries though so we need to provide the generic EEH code with
some other way to find the vf_index.

The easiest thing to do here is move the vf_index field out of pci_dn and
into eeh_dev.  Currently pci_dn and eeh_dev are allocated and initialized
together so this is a fairly minimal change in preparation for splitting
pci_dn and eeh_dev in the future.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-3-oohall@gmail.com
parent d74ee8e9
......@@ -148,7 +148,10 @@ struct eeh_dev {
struct pci_dn *pdn; /* Associated PCI device node */
struct pci_dev *pdev; /* Associated PCI device */
bool in_error; /* Error flag for edev */
/* VF specific properties */
struct pci_dev *physfn; /* Associated SRIOV PF */
int vf_index; /* Index of this VF */
};
/* "fmt" must be a simple literal string */
......
......@@ -202,7 +202,6 @@ struct pci_dn {
#define IODA_INVALID_PE 0xFFFFFFFF
unsigned int pe_number;
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
int vf_index; /* VF index in the PF */
u16 vfs_expanded; /* number of VFs IOV BAR expanded */
u16 num_vfs; /* number of VFs enabled*/
unsigned int *pe_num_map; /* PE# for the first VF PE or array */
......
......@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static void *eeh_add_virt_device(struct eeh_dev *edev)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
pci_iov_add_virtfn(edev->physfn, eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev)->vf_index);
pci_iov_add_virtfn(edev->physfn, edev->vf_index);
#endif
return NULL;
}
......@@ -521,9 +521,7 @@ static void eeh_rmv_device(struct eeh_dev *edev, void *userdata)
if (edev->physfn) {
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
pci_iov_remove_virtfn(edev->physfn, pdn->vf_index);
pci_iov_remove_virtfn(edev->physfn, edev->vf_index);
edev->pdev = NULL;
#endif
if (rmv_data)
......
......@@ -146,7 +146,6 @@ static struct eeh_dev *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn)
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
static struct pci_dn *add_one_sriov_vf_pdn(struct pci_dn *parent,
int vf_index,
int busno, int devfn)
{
struct pci_dn *pdn;
......@@ -163,7 +162,6 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_sriov_vf_pdn(struct pci_dn *parent,
pdn->parent = parent;
pdn->busno = busno;
pdn->devfn = devfn;
pdn->vf_index = vf_index;
pdn->pe_number = IODA_INVALID_PE;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdn->child_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdn->list);
......@@ -194,7 +192,7 @@ struct pci_dn *add_sriov_vf_pdns(struct pci_dev *pdev)
for (i = 0; i < pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev); i++) {
struct eeh_dev *edev __maybe_unused;
pdn = add_one_sriov_vf_pdn(parent, i,
pdn = add_one_sriov_vf_pdn(parent,
pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, i),
pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, i));
if (!pdn) {
......@@ -207,7 +205,10 @@ struct pci_dn *add_sriov_vf_pdns(struct pci_dev *pdev)
/* Create the EEH device for the VF */
edev = eeh_dev_init(pdn);
BUG_ON(!edev);
/* FIXME: these should probably be populated by the EEH probe */
edev->physfn = pdev;
edev->vf_index = i;
#endif /* CONFIG_EEH */
}
return pci_get_pdn(pdev);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment