Commit e151db8e authored by Mikulas Patocka's avatar Mikulas Patocka Committed by Jens Axboe

md-raid: destroy the bitmap after destroying the thread

When we ran the lvm test "shell/integrity-blocksize-3.sh" on a kernel with
kasan, we got failure in write_page.

The reason for the failure is that md_bitmap_destroy is called before
destroying the thread and the thread may be waiting in the function
write_page for the bio to complete. When the thread finishes waiting, it
executes "if (test_bit(BITMAP_WRITE_ERROR, &bitmap->flags))", which
triggers the kasan warning.

Note that the commit 48df498d that caused this bug claims that it is
neede for md-cluster, you should check md-cluster and possibly find
another bugfix for it.

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in write_page+0x18d/0x680 [md_mod]
Read of size 8 at addr ffff889162030c78 by task mdX_raid1/5539

CPU: 10 PID: 5539 Comm: mdX_raid1 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc2 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44
 print_report.cold+0x45/0x57a
 ? __lock_text_start+0x18/0x18
 ? write_page+0x18d/0x680 [md_mod]
 kasan_report+0xa8/0xe0
 ? write_page+0x18d/0x680 [md_mod]
 kasan_check_range+0x13f/0x180
 write_page+0x18d/0x680 [md_mod]
 ? super_sync+0x4d5/0x560 [dm_raid]
 ? md_bitmap_file_kick+0xa0/0xa0 [md_mod]
 ? rs_set_dev_and_array_sectors+0x2e0/0x2e0 [dm_raid]
 ? mutex_trylock+0x120/0x120
 ? preempt_count_add+0x6b/0xc0
 ? preempt_count_sub+0xf/0xc0
 md_update_sb+0x707/0xe40 [md_mod]
 md_reap_sync_thread+0x1b2/0x4a0 [md_mod]
 md_check_recovery+0x533/0x960 [md_mod]
 raid1d+0xc8/0x2a20 [raid1]
 ? var_wake_function+0xe0/0xe0
 ? psi_group_change+0x411/0x500
 ? preempt_count_sub+0xf/0xc0
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x78/0xc0
 ? __lock_text_start+0x18/0x18
 ? raid1_end_read_request+0x2a0/0x2a0 [raid1]
 ? preempt_count_sub+0xf/0xc0
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x19/0x40
 ? del_timer_sync+0xa9/0x100
 ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0xc0/0xc0
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x78/0xc0
 ? __lock_text_start+0x18/0x18
 ? __list_del_entry_valid+0x68/0xa0
 ? finish_wait+0xa3/0x100
 md_thread+0x161/0x260 [md_mod]
 ? unregister_md_personality+0xa0/0xa0 [md_mod]
 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x78/0xc0
 ? prepare_to_wait_event+0x2c0/0x2c0
 ? unregister_md_personality+0xa0/0xa0 [md_mod]
 kthread+0x148/0x180
 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
 </TASK>

Allocated by task 5522:
 kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
 __kasan_kmalloc+0x80/0xa0
 md_bitmap_create+0xa8/0xe80 [md_mod]
 md_run+0x777/0x1300 [md_mod]
 raid_ctr+0x249c/0x4a30 [dm_raid]
 dm_table_add_target+0x2b0/0x620 [dm_mod]
 table_load+0x1c8/0x400 [dm_mod]
 ctl_ioctl+0x29e/0x560 [dm_mod]
 dm_compat_ctl_ioctl+0x7/0x20 [dm_mod]
 __do_compat_sys_ioctl+0xfa/0x160
 do_syscall_64+0x90/0xc0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Freed by task 5680:
 kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x40
 kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x40
 __kasan_slab_free+0xf7/0x140
 kfree+0x80/0x240
 md_bitmap_free+0x1c3/0x280 [md_mod]
 __md_stop+0x21/0x120 [md_mod]
 md_stop+0x9/0x40 [md_mod]
 raid_dtr+0x1b/0x40 [dm_raid]
 dm_table_destroy+0x98/0x1e0 [dm_mod]
 __dm_destroy+0x199/0x360 [dm_mod]
 dev_remove+0x10c/0x160 [dm_mod]
 ctl_ioctl+0x29e/0x560 [dm_mod]
 dm_compat_ctl_ioctl+0x7/0x20 [dm_mod]
 __do_compat_sys_ioctl+0xfa/0x160
 do_syscall_64+0x90/0xc0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
Signed-off-by: default avatarMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 48df498d ("md: move bitmap_destroy to the beginning of __md_stop")
Signed-off-by: default avatarSong Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 34cb92c0
......@@ -6238,11 +6238,11 @@ static void mddev_detach(struct mddev *mddev)
static void __md_stop(struct mddev *mddev)
{
struct md_personality *pers = mddev->pers;
md_bitmap_destroy(mddev);
mddev_detach(mddev);
/* Ensure ->event_work is done */
if (mddev->event_work.func)
flush_workqueue(md_misc_wq);
md_bitmap_destroy(mddev);
spin_lock(&mddev->lock);
mddev->pers = NULL;
spin_unlock(&mddev->lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment