Commit e1539036 authored by Nix's avatar Nix Committed by Shaohua Li

md: report sector of stripes with check mismatches

This makes it possible, with appropriate filesystem support, for a
sysadmin to tell what is affected by the mismatch, and whether
it should be ignored (if it's inside a swap partition, for
instance).

We ratelimit to prevent log flooding: if there are so many
mismatches that ratelimiting is necessary, the individual messages
are relatively unlikely to be important (either the machine is
swapping like crazy or something is very wrong with the disk).
Signed-off-by: default avatarNick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
parent 4179bc30
......@@ -4085,10 +4085,15 @@ static void handle_parity_checks5(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
else {
atomic64_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &conf->mddev->resync_mismatches);
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &conf->mddev->recovery))
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &conf->mddev->recovery)) {
/* don't try to repair!! */
set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
else {
pr_warn_ratelimited("%s: mismatch sector in range "
"%llu-%llu\n", mdname(conf->mddev),
(unsigned long long) sh->sector,
(unsigned long long) sh->sector +
STRIPE_SECTORS);
} else {
sh->check_state = check_state_compute_run;
set_bit(STRIPE_COMPUTE_RUN, &sh->state);
set_bit(STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK, &s->ops_request);
......@@ -4237,10 +4242,15 @@ static void handle_parity_checks6(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
}
} else {
atomic64_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &conf->mddev->resync_mismatches);
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &conf->mddev->recovery))
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &conf->mddev->recovery)) {
/* don't try to repair!! */
set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
else {
pr_warn_ratelimited("%s: mismatch sector in range "
"%llu-%llu\n", mdname(conf->mddev),
(unsigned long long) sh->sector,
(unsigned long long) sh->sector +
STRIPE_SECTORS);
} else {
int *target = &sh->ops.target;
sh->ops.target = -1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment