bpf: fix potential deadlock in bpf_prog_register
Lockdep found a potential deadlock between cpu_hotplug_lock, bpf_event_mutex, and cpuctx_mutex: [ 13.007000] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 13.007587] 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f89-dirty #477 Not tainted [ 13.008124] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 13.008624] test_progs/246 is trying to acquire lock: [ 13.009030] 0000000094160d1d (tracepoints_mutex){+.+.}, at: tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.009770] [ 13.009770] but task is already holding lock: [ 13.010239] 00000000d663ef86 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}, at: bpf_probe_register+0x1d/0x60 [ 13.010877] [ 13.010877] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 13.010877] [ 13.011532] [ 13.011532] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 13.012129] [ 13.012129] -> #4 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}: [ 13.012582] perf_event_query_prog_array+0x9b/0x130 [ 13.013016] _perf_ioctl+0x3aa/0x830 [ 13.013354] perf_ioctl+0x2e/0x50 [ 13.013668] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8f/0x6a0 [ 13.014003] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 13.014320] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 13.014668] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.015007] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.015469] [ 13.015469] -> #3 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}: [ 13.015910] perf_event_init_cpu+0x5a/0x90 [ 13.016291] perf_event_init+0x1b2/0x1de [ 13.016654] start_kernel+0x2b8/0x42a [ 13.016995] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 13.017382] [ 13.017382] -> #2 (pmus_lock){+.+.}: [ 13.017794] perf_event_init_cpu+0x21/0x90 [ 13.018172] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb3/0x960 [ 13.018573] _cpu_up+0xa7/0x140 [ 13.018871] do_cpu_up+0xa4/0xc0 [ 13.019178] smp_init+0xcd/0xd2 [ 13.019483] kernel_init_freeable+0x123/0x24f [ 13.019878] kernel_init+0xa/0x110 [ 13.020201] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 13.020541] [ 13.020541] -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: [ 13.021051] static_key_slow_inc+0xe/0x20 [ 13.021424] tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x28c/0x300 [ 13.021891] perf_trace_event_init+0x11f/0x250 [ 13.022297] perf_trace_init+0x6b/0xa0 [ 13.022644] perf_tp_event_init+0x25/0x40 [ 13.023011] perf_try_init_event+0x6b/0x90 [ 13.023386] perf_event_alloc+0x9a8/0xc40 [ 13.023754] __do_sys_perf_event_open+0x1dd/0xd30 [ 13.024173] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.024519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.024968] [ 13.024968] -> #0 (tracepoints_mutex){+.+.}: [ 13.025434] __mutex_lock+0x86/0x970 [ 13.025764] tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.026215] bpf_probe_register+0x40/0x60 [ 13.026584] bpf_raw_tracepoint_open.isra.34+0xa4/0x130 [ 13.027042] __do_sys_bpf+0x94f/0x1a90 [ 13.027389] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.027727] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.028171] [ 13.028171] other info that might help us debug this: [ 13.028171] [ 13.028807] Chain exists of: [ 13.028807] tracepoints_mutex --> &cpuctx_mutex --> bpf_event_mutex [ 13.028807] [ 13.029666] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 13.029666] [ 13.030140] CPU0 CPU1 [ 13.030510] ---- ---- [ 13.030875] lock(bpf_event_mutex); [ 13.031166] lock(&cpuctx_mutex); [ 13.031645] lock(bpf_event_mutex); [ 13.032135] lock(tracepoints_mutex); [ 13.032441] [ 13.032441] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 13.032441] [ 13.032911] 1 lock held by test_progs/246: [ 13.033239] #0: 00000000d663ef86 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}, at: bpf_probe_register+0x1d/0x60 [ 13.033909] [ 13.033909] stack backtrace: [ 13.034258] CPU: 1 PID: 246 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f89-dirty #477 [ 13.034964] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 [ 13.035657] Call Trace: [ 13.035859] dump_stack+0x5f/0x8b [ 13.036130] print_circular_bug.isra.37+0x1ce/0x1db [ 13.036526] __lock_acquire+0x1158/0x1350 [ 13.036852] ? lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 13.037154] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 13.037447] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.037876] __mutex_lock+0x86/0x970 [ 13.038167] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.038600] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.039028] ? __mutex_lock+0x86/0x970 [ 13.039337] ? __mutex_lock+0x24a/0x970 [ 13.039649] ? bpf_probe_register+0x1d/0x60 [ 13.039992] ? __bpf_trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi+0x10/0x10 [ 13.040478] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.040906] tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.041325] bpf_probe_register+0x40/0x60 [ 13.041649] bpf_raw_tracepoint_open.isra.34+0xa4/0x130 [ 13.042068] ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 [ 13.042374] __do_sys_bpf+0x94f/0x1a90 [ 13.042678] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.042975] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.043382] RIP: 0033:0x7f23b10a07f9 [ 13.045155] RSP: 002b:00007ffdef42fdd8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141 [ 13.045759] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffdef42ff70 RCX: 00007f23b10a07f9 [ 13.046326] RDX: 0000000000000070 RSI: 00007ffdef42fe10 RDI: 0000000000000011 [ 13.046893] RBP: 00007ffdef42fdf0 R08: 0000000000000038 R09: 00007ffdef42fe10 [ 13.047462] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 13.048029] R13: 0000000000000016 R14: 00007f23b1db4690 R15: 0000000000000000 Since tracepoints_mutex will be taken in tracepoint_probe_register/unregister() there is no need to take bpf_event_mutex too. bpf_event_mutex is protecting modifications to prog array used in kprobe/perf bpf progs. bpf_raw_tracepoints don't need to take this mutex. Fixes: c4f6699d ("bpf: introduce BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT") Acked-by:Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment