Commit e2329b42 authored by Dou Liyang's avatar Dou Liyang Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/cpu: Remove unused and undefined __generic_processor_info() declaration

The following revert:

  2b85b3d2 ("x86/acpi: Restore the order of CPU IDs")

... got rid of __generic_processor_info(), but forgot to remove its
declaration in mpspec.h.

Remove the declaration and update the comments as well.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1505101403-29100-1-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 21d9bb4a
...@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ static inline void e820__memblock_alloc_reserved_mpc_new(void) { } ...@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ static inline void e820__memblock_alloc_reserved_mpc_new(void) { }
#endif #endif
int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version); int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version);
int __generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version, bool enabled);
#define PHYSID_ARRAY_SIZE BITS_TO_LONGS(MAX_LOCAL_APIC) #define PHYSID_ARRAY_SIZE BITS_TO_LONGS(MAX_LOCAL_APIC)
......
...@@ -2130,7 +2130,7 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version) ...@@ -2130,7 +2130,7 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
* Since fixing handling of boot_cpu_physical_apicid requires * Since fixing handling of boot_cpu_physical_apicid requires
* another discussion and tests on each platform, we leave it * another discussion and tests on each platform, we leave it
* for now and here we use read_apic_id() directly in this * for now and here we use read_apic_id() directly in this
* function, __generic_processor_info(). * function, generic_processor_info().
*/ */
if (disabled_cpu_apicid != BAD_APICID && if (disabled_cpu_apicid != BAD_APICID &&
disabled_cpu_apicid != read_apic_id() && disabled_cpu_apicid != read_apic_id() &&
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment