Commit e2422970 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by David S. Miller

[NET]: should explicitely initialize atomic_t field in struct dst_ops

All but one struct dst_ops static initializations miss explicit
initialization of entries field.

As this field is atomic_t, we should use ATOMIC_INIT(0), and not
rely on atomic_t implementation.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent ad1984e8
......@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ static struct dst_ops ipv4_dst_ops = {
.update_pmtu = ip_rt_update_pmtu,
.local_out = ip_local_out,
.entry_size = sizeof(struct rtable),
.entries = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
};
#define ECN_OR_COST(class) TC_PRIO_##class
......@@ -2498,6 +2499,7 @@ static struct dst_ops ipv4_dst_blackhole_ops = {
.check = ipv4_dst_check,
.update_pmtu = ipv4_rt_blackhole_update_pmtu,
.entry_size = sizeof(struct rtable),
.entries = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
};
......
......@@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ static struct dst_ops xfrm4_dst_ops = {
.local_out = __ip_local_out,
.gc_thresh = 1024,
.entry_size = sizeof(struct xfrm_dst),
.entries = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
};
static struct xfrm_policy_afinfo xfrm4_policy_afinfo = {
......
......@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ static struct dst_ops ip6_dst_ops = {
.update_pmtu = ip6_rt_update_pmtu,
.local_out = ip6_local_out,
.entry_size = sizeof(struct rt6_info),
.entries = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
};
static void ip6_rt_blackhole_update_pmtu(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 mtu)
......@@ -120,6 +121,7 @@ static struct dst_ops ip6_dst_blackhole_ops = {
.check = ip6_dst_check,
.update_pmtu = ip6_rt_blackhole_update_pmtu,
.entry_size = sizeof(struct rt6_info),
.entries = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
};
struct rt6_info ip6_null_entry = {
......
......@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ static struct dst_ops xfrm6_dst_ops = {
.local_out = __ip6_local_out,
.gc_thresh = 1024,
.entry_size = sizeof(struct xfrm_dst),
.entries = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
};
static struct xfrm_policy_afinfo xfrm6_policy_afinfo = {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment