Commit e28ecca6 authored by Sudip Mukherjee's avatar Sudip Mukherjee Committed by Linus Walleij

gpio: fix warning about iterator

We were getting build warning about "iterator" being used uninitialized.
Use iterator properly to fix the build warning and in the process remove
the variable "pos" which is not required now.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
parent 60befd2e
......@@ -189,23 +189,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_direction);
*/
static int gpiochip_add_to_list(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
struct list_head *pos;
struct gpio_chip *iterator;
struct gpio_chip *previous = NULL;
if (list_empty(&gpio_chips)) {
pos = gpio_chips.next;
goto found;
list_add_tail(&chip->list, &gpio_chips);
return 0;
}
list_for_each(pos, &gpio_chips) {
iterator = list_entry(pos, struct gpio_chip, list);
list_for_each_entry(iterator, &gpio_chips, list) {
if (iterator->base >= chip->base + chip->ngpio) {
/*
* Iterator is the first GPIO chip so there is no
* previous one
*/
if (previous == NULL) {
if (!previous) {
goto found;
} else {
/*
......@@ -221,7 +219,13 @@ static int gpiochip_add_to_list(struct gpio_chip *chip)
previous = iterator;
}
/* We are beyond the last chip in the list */
/*
* We are beyond the last chip in the list and iterator now
* points to the head.
* Let iterator point to the last chip in the list.
*/
iterator = list_last_entry(&gpio_chips, struct gpio_chip, list);
if (iterator->base + iterator->ngpio <= chip->base)
goto found;
......@@ -230,7 +234,7 @@ static int gpiochip_add_to_list(struct gpio_chip *chip)
return -EBUSY;
found:
list_add_tail(&chip->list, pos);
list_add_tail(&chip->list, &iterator->list);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment