Commit e381a0f6 authored by Eric Sandeen's avatar Eric Sandeen Committed by Darrick J. Wong

xfs: remove unused flags arg from xfs_dquot_verify

Long ago the flags argument was used to determine whether to issue warnings
about corruptions, but that's done elsewhere now and the flag is unused
here, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
parent dfa03a5f
...@@ -47,8 +47,7 @@ xfs_dquot_verify( ...@@ -47,8 +47,7 @@ xfs_dquot_verify(
struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_mount *mp,
xfs_disk_dquot_t *ddq, xfs_disk_dquot_t *ddq,
xfs_dqid_t id, xfs_dqid_t id,
uint type, /* used only when IO_dorepair is true */ uint type) /* used only when IO_dorepair is true */
uint flags)
{ {
/* /*
* We can encounter an uninitialized dquot buffer for 2 reasons: * We can encounter an uninitialized dquot buffer for 2 reasons:
...@@ -200,7 +199,7 @@ xfs_dquot_buf_verify( ...@@ -200,7 +199,7 @@ xfs_dquot_buf_verify(
if (i == 0) if (i == 0)
id = be32_to_cpu(ddq->d_id); id = be32_to_cpu(ddq->d_id);
fa = xfs_dquot_verify(mp, ddq, id + i, 0, 0); fa = xfs_dquot_verify(mp, ddq, id + i, 0);
if (fa) if (fa)
return fa; return fa;
} }
......
...@@ -152,8 +152,7 @@ typedef uint16_t xfs_qwarncnt_t; ...@@ -152,8 +152,7 @@ typedef uint16_t xfs_qwarncnt_t;
#define XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK (XFS_QMOPT_RES_REGBLKS | XFS_QMOPT_RES_RTBLKS) #define XFS_QMOPT_RESBLK_MASK (XFS_QMOPT_RES_REGBLKS | XFS_QMOPT_RES_RTBLKS)
extern xfs_failaddr_t xfs_dquot_verify(struct xfs_mount *mp, extern xfs_failaddr_t xfs_dquot_verify(struct xfs_mount *mp,
struct xfs_disk_dquot *ddq, xfs_dqid_t id, uint type, struct xfs_disk_dquot *ddq, xfs_dqid_t id, uint type);
uint flags);
extern int xfs_calc_dquots_per_chunk(unsigned int nbblks); extern int xfs_calc_dquots_per_chunk(unsigned int nbblks);
extern int xfs_dquot_repair(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_disk_dquot *ddq, extern int xfs_dquot_repair(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_disk_dquot *ddq,
xfs_dqid_t id, uint type); xfs_dqid_t id, uint type);
......
...@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ xfs_qm_dqflush( ...@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ xfs_qm_dqflush(
/* /*
* A simple sanity check in case we got a corrupted dquot.. * A simple sanity check in case we got a corrupted dquot..
*/ */
fa = xfs_dquot_verify(mp, &dqp->q_core, be32_to_cpu(ddqp->d_id), 0, 0); fa = xfs_dquot_verify(mp, &dqp->q_core, be32_to_cpu(ddqp->d_id), 0);
if (fa) { if (fa) {
xfs_alert(mp, "corrupt dquot ID 0x%x in memory at %pS", xfs_alert(mp, "corrupt dquot ID 0x%x in memory at %pS",
be32_to_cpu(ddqp->d_id), fa); be32_to_cpu(ddqp->d_id), fa);
......
...@@ -2702,7 +2702,7 @@ xlog_recover_do_reg_buffer( ...@@ -2702,7 +2702,7 @@ xlog_recover_do_reg_buffer(
goto next; goto next;
} }
fa = xfs_dquot_verify(mp, item->ri_buf[i].i_addr, fa = xfs_dquot_verify(mp, item->ri_buf[i].i_addr,
-1, 0, 0); -1, 0);
if (fa) { if (fa) {
xfs_alert(mp, xfs_alert(mp,
"dquot corrupt at %pS trying to replay into block 0x%llx", "dquot corrupt at %pS trying to replay into block 0x%llx",
...@@ -3348,7 +3348,7 @@ xlog_recover_dquot_pass2( ...@@ -3348,7 +3348,7 @@ xlog_recover_dquot_pass2(
*/ */
dq_f = item->ri_buf[0].i_addr; dq_f = item->ri_buf[0].i_addr;
ASSERT(dq_f); ASSERT(dq_f);
fa = xfs_dquot_verify(mp, recddq, dq_f->qlf_id, 0, 0); fa = xfs_dquot_verify(mp, recddq, dq_f->qlf_id, 0);
if (fa) { if (fa) {
xfs_alert(mp, "corrupt dquot ID 0x%x in log at %pS", xfs_alert(mp, "corrupt dquot ID 0x%x in log at %pS",
dq_f->qlf_id, fa); dq_f->qlf_id, fa);
......
...@@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ xfs_qm_reset_dqcounts( ...@@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ xfs_qm_reset_dqcounts(
* find uninitialised dquot blks. See comment in * find uninitialised dquot blks. See comment in
* xfs_dquot_verify. * xfs_dquot_verify.
*/ */
fa = xfs_dquot_verify(mp, ddq, id + j, type, 0); fa = xfs_dquot_verify(mp, ddq, id + j, type);
if (fa) if (fa)
xfs_dquot_repair(mp, ddq, id + j, type); xfs_dquot_repair(mp, ddq, id + j, type);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment