Commit e4239115 authored by Mark Brown's avatar Mark Brown Committed by Will Deacon

selftests: arm64: Fix and enable test for setting current VL in vec-syscfg

We had some test code for verifying that we can write the current VL via
the prctl() interface but the condition for the test was inverted which
wasn't noticed as it was never actually hooked up to the array of tests
we execute. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929151925.9601-4-broonie@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
parent 4caf339c
...@@ -329,12 +329,9 @@ static void prctl_set_same(struct vec_data *data) ...@@ -329,12 +329,9 @@ static void prctl_set_same(struct vec_data *data)
return; return;
} }
if (cur_vl != data->rdvl()) ksft_test_result(cur_vl == data->rdvl(),
ksft_test_result_pass("%s current VL is %d\n", "%s set VL %d and have VL %d\n",
data->name, ret); data->name, cur_vl, data->rdvl());
else
ksft_test_result_fail("%s prctl() VL %d but RDVL is %d\n",
data->name, ret, data->rdvl());
} }
/* Can we set a new VL for this process? */ /* Can we set a new VL for this process? */
...@@ -555,6 +552,7 @@ static const test_type tests[] = { ...@@ -555,6 +552,7 @@ static const test_type tests[] = {
proc_write_max, proc_write_max,
prctl_get, prctl_get,
prctl_set_same,
prctl_set, prctl_set,
prctl_set_no_child, prctl_set_no_child,
prctl_set_for_child, prctl_set_for_child,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment