Commit e5ca8071 authored by Yafang Shao's avatar Yafang Shao Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm/vmscan.c: add a new member reclaim_state in struct shrink_control

Patch series "mm/vmscan: calculate reclaimed slab in all reclaim paths".

This patchset is to fix the issues in doing shrink slab.

There're six different reclaim paths by now,
 - kswapd reclaim path
 - node reclaim path
 - hibernate preallocate memory reclaim path
 - direct reclaim path
 - memcg reclaim path
 - memcg softlimit reclaim path

The slab caches reclaimed in these paths are only calculated in the
above three paths.  The issues are detailed explained in patch #2.  We
should calculate the reclaimed slab caches in every reclaim path.  In
order to do it, the struct reclaim_state is placed into the struct
shrink_control.

In node reclaim path, there'is another issue about shrinking slab, which
is adressed in "mm/vmscan: shrink slab in node reclaim"
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1559874946-22960-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com/).

This patch (of 2):

The struct reclaim_state is used to record how many slab caches are
reclaimed in one reclaim path.  The struct shrink_control is used to
control one reclaim path.  So we'd better put reclaim_state into
shrink_control.

[laoar.shao@gmail.com: remove reclaim_state assignment from __perform_reclaim()]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1561381582-13697-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1561112086-6169-2-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarYafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 766a4c19
......@@ -4102,7 +4102,6 @@ static int
__perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
const struct alloc_context *ac)
{
struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
int progress;
unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
unsigned long pflags;
......@@ -4114,13 +4113,10 @@ __perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_mask);
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
progress = try_to_free_pages(ac->zonelist, order, gfp_mask,
ac->nodemask);
current->reclaim_state = NULL;
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
fs_reclaim_release(gfp_mask);
psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
......
......@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ struct scan_control {
unsigned int file_taken;
unsigned int taken;
} nr;
/* for recording the reclaimed slab by now */
struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
};
#ifdef ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH
......@@ -3483,6 +3486,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
.may_unmap = 1,
};
current->reclaim_state = &sc.reclaim_state;
psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
__fs_reclaim_acquire();
......@@ -3664,6 +3668,8 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
snapshot_refaults(NULL, pgdat);
__fs_reclaim_release();
psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
current->reclaim_state = NULL;
/*
* Return the order kswapd stopped reclaiming at as
* prepare_kswapd_sleep() takes it into account. If another caller
......@@ -3787,15 +3793,10 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
unsigned int classzone_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1;
pg_data_t *pgdat = (pg_data_t*)p;
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
.reclaimed_slab = 0,
};
const struct cpumask *cpumask = cpumask_of_node(pgdat->node_id);
if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask))
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, cpumask);
current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
/*
* Tell the memory management that we're a "memory allocator",
......@@ -3857,7 +3858,6 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
}
tsk->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_KSWAPD);
current->reclaim_state = NULL;
return 0;
}
......@@ -3922,7 +3922,6 @@ void wakeup_kswapd(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_flags, int order,
*/
unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
{
struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
struct scan_control sc = {
.nr_to_reclaim = nr_to_reclaim,
.gfp_mask = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE,
......@@ -3940,8 +3939,7 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
fs_reclaim_acquire(sc.gfp_mask);
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
p->reclaim_state = &sc.reclaim_state;
nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
......@@ -4110,7 +4108,6 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in
/* Minimum pages needed in order to stay on node */
const unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order;
struct task_struct *p = current;
struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
struct scan_control sc = {
.nr_to_reclaim = max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
......@@ -4135,8 +4132,7 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in
*/
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
p->flags |= PF_SWAPWRITE;
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
p->reclaim_state = &sc.reclaim_state;
if (node_pagecache_reclaimable(pgdat) > pgdat->min_unmapped_pages) {
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment