Commit e5e11703 authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds

Merge tag 'wq-for-6.6-rc5-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq

Pull workqueue fixes from Tejun Heo:

 - Fix access-after-free in pwq allocation error path

 - Implicitly ordered unbound workqueues should lose the implicit
   ordering if an attribute change which isn't compatible with ordered
   operation is requested. However, attribute changes requested through
   the sysfs interface weren't doing that leaving no way to override the
   implicit ordering through the sysfs interface. Fix it.

 - Other doc and misc updates

* tag 'wq-for-6.6-rc5-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq:
  workqueue: fix -Wformat-truncation in create_worker
  workqueue: Override implicit ordered attribute in workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask()
  workqueue: Use the kmem_cache_free() instead of kfree() to release pwq
  workqueue: doc: Fix function and sysfs path errors
  workqueue: Fix UAF report by KASAN in pwq_release_workfn()
parents e8c127b0 5d9c7a1e
......@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ unbound worker-pools and only one work item could be active at any given
time thus achieving the same ordering property as ST wq.
In the current implementation the above configuration only guarantees
ST behavior within a given NUMA node. Instead ``alloc_ordered_queue()`` should
ST behavior within a given NUMA node. Instead ``alloc_ordered_workqueue()`` should
be used to achieve system-wide ST behavior.
......@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ The default affinity scope can be changed with the module parameter
scope can be changed using ``apply_workqueue_attrs()``.
If ``WQ_SYSFS`` is set, the workqueue will have the following affinity scope
related interface files under its ``/sys/devices/virtual/WQ_NAME/``
related interface files under its ``/sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/WQ_NAME/``
directory.
``affinity_scope``
......
......@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ workqueue将自动创建与属性相匹配的后备工作者池。调节并发
同的排序属性。
在目前的实现中,上述配置只保证了特定NUMA节点内的ST行为。相反,
``alloc_ordered_queue()`` 应该被用来实现全系统的ST行为。
``alloc_ordered_workqueue()`` 应该被用来实现全系统的ST行为。
执行场景示例
......
......@@ -2166,7 +2166,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
{
struct worker *worker;
int id;
char id_buf[16];
char id_buf[23];
/* ID is needed to determine kthread name */
id = ida_alloc(&pool->worker_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
......@@ -4600,12 +4600,22 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
}
cpus_read_unlock();
/* for unbound pwq, flush the pwq_release_worker ensures that the
* pwq_release_workfn() completes before calling kfree(wq).
*/
if (ret)
kthread_flush_worker(pwq_release_worker);
return ret;
enomem:
if (wq->cpu_pwq) {
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu));
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct pool_workqueue *pwq = *per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
if (pwq)
kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
}
free_percpu(wq->cpu_pwq);
wq->cpu_pwq = NULL;
}
......@@ -5782,9 +5792,13 @@ static int workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(const cpumask_var_t unbound_cpumask)
list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
continue;
/* creating multiple pwqs breaks ordering guarantee */
if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED)
continue;
if (!list_empty(&wq->pwqs)) {
if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT)
continue;
wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED;
}
ctx = apply_wqattrs_prepare(wq, wq->unbound_attrs, unbound_cpumask);
if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment