Commit e5feed0f authored by Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi's avatar Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Fix copy_map_value, zero_map_value

The current offset needs to also skip over the already copied region in
addition to the size of the next field. This case manifests where there
are gaps between adjacent special fields.

It was observed that for a map value with size 48, having fields at:
off:  0, 16, 32
size: 4, 16, 16

The current code does:

memcpy(dst + 0, src + 0, 0)
memcpy(dst + 4, src + 4, 12)
memcpy(dst + 20, src + 20, 12)
memcpy(dst + 36, src + 36, 12)

With the fix, it is done correctly as:

memcpy(dst + 0, src + 0, 0)
memcpy(dst + 4, src + 4, 12)
memcpy(dst + 32, src + 32, 0)
memcpy(dst + 48, src + 48, 0)

Fixes: 4d7d7f69 ("bpf: Adapt copy_map_value for multiple offset case")
Signed-off-by: default avatarKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-4-memxor@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent 2d577252
......@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static inline void bpf_obj_memcpy(struct btf_field_offs *foffs,
u32 sz = next_off - curr_off;
memcpy(dst + curr_off, src + curr_off, sz);
curr_off += foffs->field_sz[i];
curr_off += foffs->field_sz[i] + sz;
}
memcpy(dst + curr_off, src + curr_off, size - curr_off);
}
......@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static inline void bpf_obj_memzero(struct btf_field_offs *foffs, void *dst, u32
u32 sz = next_off - curr_off;
memset(dst + curr_off, 0, sz);
curr_off += foffs->field_sz[i];
curr_off += foffs->field_sz[i] + sz;
}
memset(dst + curr_off, 0, size - curr_off);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment