bpf: Mark bpf prog stack with kmsan_unposion_memory in interpreter mode

syzbot reported uninit memory usages during map_{lookup,delete}_elem.

==========
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __dev_map_lookup_elem kernel/bpf/devmap.c:441 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in dev_map_lookup_elem+0xf3/0x170 kernel/bpf/devmap.c:796
__dev_map_lookup_elem kernel/bpf/devmap.c:441 [inline]
dev_map_lookup_elem+0xf3/0x170 kernel/bpf/devmap.c:796
____bpf_map_lookup_elem kernel/bpf/helpers.c:42 [inline]
bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x5c/0x80 kernel/bpf/helpers.c:38
___bpf_prog_run+0x13fe/0xe0f0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997
__bpf_prog_run256+0xb5/0xe0 kernel/bpf/core.c:2237
==========

The reproducer should be in the interpreter mode.

The C reproducer is trying to run the following bpf prog:

    0: (18) r0 = 0x0
    2: (18) r1 = map[id:49]
    4: (b7) r8 = 16777216
    5: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r8
    6: (bf) r2 = r10
    7: (07) r2 += -229
            ^^^^^^^^^^

    8: (b7) r3 = 8
    9: (b7) r4 = 0
   10: (85) call dev_map_lookup_elem#1543472
   11: (95) exit

It is due to the "void *key" (r2) passed to the helper. bpf allows uninit
stack memory access for bpf prog with the right privileges. This patch
uses kmsan_unpoison_memory() to mark the stack as initialized.

This should address different syzbot reports on the uninit "void *key"
argument during map_{lookup,delete}_elem.

Reported-by: syzbot+603bcd9b0bf1d94dbb9b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000f9ce6d061494e694@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+eb02dc7f03dce0ef39f3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000a5c69c06147c2238@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+b4e65ca24fd4d0c734c3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000ac56fb06143b6cfa@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+d2b113dc9fea5e1d2848@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0000000000000d69b206142d1ff7@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+1a3cf6f08d68868f9db3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0000000000006f876b061478e878@google.com/
Tested-by: syzbot+1a3cf6f08d68868f9db3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328185801.1843078-1-martin.lau@linux.devSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

kernel/bpf/core.c

@@ -2218,6 +2218,7 @@ static unsigned int PROG_NAME(stack_size)(const void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn
 	u64 stack[stack_size / sizeof(u64)]; \
 	u64 regs[MAX_BPF_EXT_REG] = {}; \
 \
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(stack, sizeof(stack)); \
 	FP = (u64) (unsigned long) &stack[ARRAY_SIZE(stack)]; \
 	ARG1 = (u64) (unsigned long) ctx; \
 	return ___bpf_prog_run(regs, insn); \
@@ -2231,6 +2232,7 @@ static u64 PROG_NAME_ARGS(stack_size)(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5, \
 	u64 stack[stack_size / sizeof(u64)]; \
 	u64 regs[MAX_BPF_EXT_REG]; \
 \
+	kmsan_unpoison_memory(stack, sizeof(stack)); \
 	FP = (u64) (unsigned long) &stack[ARRAY_SIZE(stack)]; \
 	BPF_R1 = r1; \
 	BPF_R2 = r2; \