Commit e8d4006d authored by Mark Rutland's avatar Mark Rutland Committed by Catalin Marinas

arm64: Remove cpus_have_const_cap()

There are no longer any users of cpus_have_const_cap(), and therefore it
can be removed.

Remove cpus_have_const_cap(). At the same time, remove
__cpus_have_const_cap(), as this is a trivial wrapper of
alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which can be used directly instead.

The comment for __system_matches_cap() is updated to no longer refer to
cpus_have_const_cap(). As we have a number of ways to check the cpucaps,
the specific suggestions are removed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
parent 47759eca
......@@ -462,19 +462,6 @@ static __always_inline bool cpus_have_cap(unsigned int num)
return arch_test_bit(num, system_cpucaps);
}
/*
* Test for a capability without a runtime check.
*
* Before capabilities are finalized, this returns false.
* After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check.
*
* @num must be a compile-time constant.
*/
static __always_inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
{
return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(num);
}
/*
* Test for a capability without a runtime check.
*
......@@ -487,7 +474,7 @@ static __always_inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_boot_cap(int num)
{
if (boot_capabilities_finalized())
return __cpus_have_const_cap(num);
return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(num);
else
BUG();
}
......@@ -504,32 +491,11 @@ static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_boot_cap(int num)
static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num)
{
if (system_capabilities_finalized())
return __cpus_have_const_cap(num);
return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(num);
else
BUG();
}
/*
* Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check for non-hyp code.
*
* For hyp code, this behaves the same as cpus_have_final_cap().
*
* For non-hyp code:
* Before capabilities are finalized, this behaves as cpus_have_cap().
* After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check.
*
* @num must be a compile-time constant.
*/
static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
{
if (is_hyp_code())
return cpus_have_final_cap(num);
else if (system_capabilities_finalized())
return __cpus_have_const_cap(num);
else
return cpus_have_cap(num);
}
static inline int __attribute_const__
cpuid_feature_extract_signed_field_width(u64 features, int field, int width)
{
......
......@@ -3322,7 +3322,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(this_cpu_has_cap);
* This helper function is used in a narrow window when,
* - The system wide safe registers are set with all the SMP CPUs and,
* - The SYSTEM_FEATURE system_cpucaps may not have been set.
* In all other cases cpus_have_{const_}cap() should be used.
*/
static bool __maybe_unused __system_matches_cap(unsigned int n)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment