Commit e9539cff authored by David Sterba's avatar David Sterba

btrfs: dev-replace: remove unused members of btrfs_dev_replace

Lock owner and nesting level have been unused since day 1, probably
copy&pasted from the extent_buffer locking scheme without much thinking.
The locking of device replace is simpler and does not need any lock
nesting.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent e17385ca
...@@ -365,8 +365,6 @@ struct btrfs_dev_replace { ...@@ -365,8 +365,6 @@ struct btrfs_dev_replace {
struct btrfs_device *srcdev; struct btrfs_device *srcdev;
struct btrfs_device *tgtdev; struct btrfs_device *tgtdev;
pid_t lock_owner;
atomic_t nesting_level;
struct mutex lock_finishing_cancel_unmount; struct mutex lock_finishing_cancel_unmount;
rwlock_t lock; rwlock_t lock;
atomic_t read_locks; atomic_t read_locks;
......
...@@ -2154,8 +2154,6 @@ static void btrfs_init_btree_inode(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) ...@@ -2154,8 +2154,6 @@ static void btrfs_init_btree_inode(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
static void btrfs_init_dev_replace_locks(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) static void btrfs_init_dev_replace_locks(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{ {
fs_info->dev_replace.lock_owner = 0;
atomic_set(&fs_info->dev_replace.nesting_level, 0);
mutex_init(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount); mutex_init(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount);
rwlock_init(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock); rwlock_init(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
atomic_set(&fs_info->dev_replace.read_locks, 0); atomic_set(&fs_info->dev_replace.read_locks, 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment