Commit e9fe8efe authored by Nikolay Aleksandrov's avatar Nikolay Aleksandrov Committed by David S. Miller

bonding: procfs: clean bond->lock usage and use RCU

Use RCU to protect against slave release, the proc show function will sync
with the bond destruction by the proc locks and the fact that the bond is
released after NETDEV_UNREGISTER which causes the bonding to remove the
proc entry.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 059b47e8
......@@ -7,21 +7,18 @@
static void *bond_info_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
__acquires(RCU)
__acquires(&bond->lock)
{
struct bonding *bond = seq->private;
struct list_head *iter;
struct slave *slave;
loff_t off = 0;
/* make sure the bond won't be taken away */
rcu_read_lock();
read_lock(&bond->lock);
if (*pos == 0)
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter)
bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter)
if (++off == *pos)
return slave;
......@@ -37,12 +34,9 @@ static void *bond_info_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
++*pos;
if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
return bond_first_slave(bond);
return bond_first_slave_rcu(bond);
if (bond_is_last_slave(bond, v))
return NULL;
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
if (found)
return slave;
if (slave == v)
......@@ -53,12 +47,8 @@ static void *bond_info_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
}
static void bond_info_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
__releases(&bond->lock)
__releases(RCU)
{
struct bonding *bond = seq->private;
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment