Commit eaac9746 authored by Vivien Didelot's avatar Vivien Didelot Committed by David S. Miller

net: dsa: don't unmask port bitmaps

The unapply functions are called on the error path.

As for dsa_port_mask, enabled_port_mask and cpu_port_mask won't be used
after so there's no need to unmask the corresponding port bit from them.

This makes dsa_cpu_port_unapply() and dsa_dsa_port_unapply() identical,
which can be factorized later.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 8e8ef50b
......@@ -260,8 +260,6 @@ static void dsa_cpu_port_unapply(struct dsa_port *port)
{
devlink_port_unregister(&port->devlink_port);
dsa_cpu_dsa_destroy(port);
port->ds->cpu_port_mask &= ~BIT(port->index);
}
static int dsa_user_port_apply(struct dsa_port *port)
......@@ -300,7 +298,6 @@ static void dsa_user_port_unapply(struct dsa_port *port)
if (port->slave) {
dsa_slave_destroy(port->slave);
port->slave = NULL;
port->ds->enabled_port_mask &= ~(1 << port->index);
}
}
......@@ -512,7 +509,6 @@ static int dsa_cpu_parse(struct dsa_port *port, u32 index,
tag_ops = dsa_resolve_tag_protocol(tag_protocol);
if (IS_ERR(tag_ops)) {
dev_warn(ds->dev, "No tagger for this switch\n");
ds->cpu_port_mask &= ~BIT(index);
return PTR_ERR(tag_ops);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment