Commit eb86559a authored by Wang Yufen's avatar Wang Yufen Committed by Martin KaFai Lau

bpf: Fix memory leaks in __check_func_call

kmemleak reports this issue:

unreferenced object 0xffff88817139d000 (size 2048):
  comm "test_progs", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (age 45851.820s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<0000000045f075f0>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0
    [<0000000098b7c90a>] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230
    [<00000000b4c3c403>] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700
    [<00000000aa3875b7>] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0
    [<000000001147357b>] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0
    [<00000000b5a595b4>] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0
    [<0000000011e391b1>] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940
    [<0000000007f765c0>] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650
    [<00000000839815d6>] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0
    [<00000000946ee250>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
    [<0000000000506b7f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

The root case here is: In function prepare_func_exit(), the callee is
not released in the abnormal scenario after "state->curframe--;". To
fix, move "state->curframe--;" to the very bottom of the function,
right when we free callee and reset frame[] pointer to NULL, as Andrii
suggested.

In addition, function __check_func_call() has a similar problem. In
the abnormal scenario before "state->curframe++;", the callee also
should be released by free_func_state().

Fixes: 69c087ba ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Fixes: fd978bf7 ("bpf: Add reference tracking to verifier")
Signed-off-by: default avatarWang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1667884291-15666-1-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
parent a679120e
......@@ -6745,11 +6745,11 @@ static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
/* Transfer references to the callee */
err = copy_reference_state(callee, caller);
if (err)
return err;
goto err_out;
err = set_callee_state_cb(env, caller, callee, *insn_idx);
if (err)
return err;
goto err_out;
clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
......@@ -6766,6 +6766,11 @@ static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
print_verifier_state(env, callee, true);
}
return 0;
err_out:
free_func_state(callee);
state->frame[state->curframe + 1] = NULL;
return err;
}
int map_set_for_each_callback_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
......@@ -6979,8 +6984,7 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
return -EINVAL;
}
state->curframe--;
caller = state->frame[state->curframe];
caller = state->frame[state->curframe - 1];
if (callee->in_callback_fn) {
/* enforce R0 return value range [0, 1]. */
struct tnum range = callee->callback_ret_range;
......@@ -7019,7 +7023,7 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
}
/* clear everything in the callee */
free_func_state(callee);
state->frame[state->curframe + 1] = NULL;
state->frame[state->curframe--] = NULL;
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment