Commit ec7d2f2c authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by David S. Miller

net: __alloc_skb() speedup

With following patch I can reach maximum rate of my pktgen+udpsink
simulator :
- 'old' machine : dual quad core E5450  @3.00GHz
- 64 UDP rx flows (only differ by destination port)
- RPS enabled, NIC interrupts serviced on cpu0
- rps dispatched on 7 other cores. (~130.000 IPI per second)
- SLAB allocator (faster than SLUB in this workload)
- tg3 NIC
- 1.080.000 pps without a single drop at NIC level.

Idea is to add two prefetchw() calls in __alloc_skb(), one to prefetch
first sk_buff cache line, the second to prefetch the shinfo part.

Also using one memset() to initialize all skb_shared_info fields instead
of one by one to reduce number of instructions, using long word moves.

All skb_shared_info fields before 'dataref' are cleared in 
__alloc_skb().
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 8753d29f
......@@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ union skb_shared_tx {
* the end of the header data, ie. at skb->end.
*/
struct skb_shared_info {
atomic_t dataref;
unsigned short nr_frags;
unsigned short gso_size;
/* Warning: this field is not always filled in (UFO)! */
......@@ -197,6 +196,12 @@ struct skb_shared_info {
union skb_shared_tx tx_flags;
struct sk_buff *frag_list;
struct skb_shared_hwtstamps hwtstamps;
/*
* Warning : all fields before dataref are cleared in __alloc_skb()
*/
atomic_t dataref;
skb_frag_t frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
/* Intermediate layers must ensure that destructor_arg
* remains valid until skb destructor */
......
......@@ -181,12 +181,14 @@ struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
skb = kmem_cache_alloc_node(cache, gfp_mask & ~__GFP_DMA, node);
if (!skb)
goto out;
prefetchw(skb);
size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
data = kmalloc_node_track_caller(size + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info),
gfp_mask, node);
if (!data)
goto nodata;
prefetchw(data + size);
/*
* Only clear those fields we need to clear, not those that we will
......@@ -208,15 +210,8 @@ struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
/* make sure we initialize shinfo sequentially */
shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
memset(shinfo, 0, offsetof(struct skb_shared_info, dataref));
atomic_set(&shinfo->dataref, 1);
shinfo->nr_frags = 0;
shinfo->gso_size = 0;
shinfo->gso_segs = 0;
shinfo->gso_type = 0;
shinfo->ip6_frag_id = 0;
shinfo->tx_flags.flags = 0;
skb_frag_list_init(skb);
memset(&shinfo->hwtstamps, 0, sizeof(shinfo->hwtstamps));
if (fclone) {
struct sk_buff *child = skb + 1;
......@@ -505,16 +500,10 @@ int skb_recycle_check(struct sk_buff *skb, int skb_size)
return 0;
skb_release_head_state(skb);
shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
memset(shinfo, 0, offsetof(struct skb_shared_info, dataref));
atomic_set(&shinfo->dataref, 1);
shinfo->nr_frags = 0;
shinfo->gso_size = 0;
shinfo->gso_segs = 0;
shinfo->gso_type = 0;
shinfo->ip6_frag_id = 0;
shinfo->tx_flags.flags = 0;
skb_frag_list_init(skb);
memset(&shinfo->hwtstamps, 0, sizeof(shinfo->hwtstamps));
memset(skb, 0, offsetof(struct sk_buff, tail));
skb->data = skb->head + NET_SKB_PAD;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment