Commit ec8c360a authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller

Merge branch 'fib-rules-extack-support'

Roopa Prabhu says:

====================
fib rules extack support

First patch refactors code to move fib rule netlink handling
into a common function. This became obvious when adding
duplicate extack msgs in add and del paths. Second patch
adds extack msgs.

v2 - Dropped the ip route get support and selftests from
     the series to look at the input path some more (as pointed
     out by ido). Will come back to that next week when i have
     some time. resending just the extack part for now.
====================
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parents a56e6bcd b16fb418
......@@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ struct fib_rules_ops {
int (*configure)(struct fib_rule *,
struct sk_buff *,
struct fib_rule_hdr *,
struct nlattr **);
struct nlattr **,
struct netlink_ext_ack *);
int (*delete)(struct fib_rule *);
int (*compare)(struct fib_rule *,
struct fib_rule_hdr *,
......
This diff is collapsed.
......@@ -121,13 +121,16 @@ static int dn_fib_rule_match(struct fib_rule *rule, struct flowi *fl, int flags)
static int dn_fib_rule_configure(struct fib_rule *rule, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct fib_rule_hdr *frh,
struct nlattr **tb)
struct nlattr **tb,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
int err = -EINVAL;
struct dn_fib_rule *r = (struct dn_fib_rule *)rule;
if (frh->tos)
if (frh->tos) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid tos value");
goto errout;
}
if (rule->table == RT_TABLE_UNSPEC) {
if (rule->action == FR_ACT_TO_TBL) {
......
......@@ -213,14 +213,17 @@ static const struct nla_policy fib4_rule_policy[FRA_MAX+1] = {
static int fib4_rule_configure(struct fib_rule *rule, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct fib_rule_hdr *frh,
struct nlattr **tb)
struct nlattr **tb,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
int err = -EINVAL;
struct fib4_rule *rule4 = (struct fib4_rule *) rule;
if (frh->tos & ~IPTOS_TOS_MASK)
if (frh->tos & ~IPTOS_TOS_MASK) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid tos");
goto errout;
}
/* split local/main if they are not already split */
err = fib_unmerge(net);
......
......@@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy ipmr_rule_policy[FRA_MAX + 1] = {
};
static int ipmr_rule_configure(struct fib_rule *rule, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct fib_rule_hdr *frh, struct nlattr **tb)
struct fib_rule_hdr *frh, struct nlattr **tb,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
return 0;
}
......
......@@ -245,15 +245,18 @@ static const struct nla_policy fib6_rule_policy[FRA_MAX+1] = {
static int fib6_rule_configure(struct fib_rule *rule, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct fib_rule_hdr *frh,
struct nlattr **tb)
struct nlattr **tb,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
int err = -EINVAL;
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
struct fib6_rule *rule6 = (struct fib6_rule *) rule;
if (rule->action == FR_ACT_TO_TBL && !rule->l3mdev) {
if (rule->table == RT6_TABLE_UNSPEC)
if (rule->table == RT6_TABLE_UNSPEC) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid table");
goto errout;
}
if (fib6_new_table(net, rule->table) == NULL) {
err = -ENOBUFS;
......
......@@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy ip6mr_rule_policy[FRA_MAX + 1] = {
};
static int ip6mr_rule_configure(struct fib_rule *rule, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct fib_rule_hdr *frh, struct nlattr **tb)
struct fib_rule_hdr *frh, struct nlattr **tb,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment