Commit ece95912 authored by Jan Kara's avatar Jan Kara Committed by Linus Torvalds

inotify: send IN_ATTRIB events when link count changes

Currently, no notification event has been sent when inode's link count
changed.  This is inconvenient for the application in some cases:

Suppose you have the following directory structure

    foo/test
    bar/

and you watch test.  If someone does "mv foo/test bar/", you get event
IN_MOVE_SELF and you know something has happened with the file "test".
However if someone does "ln foo/test bar/test" and "rm foo/test" you get no
inotify event for the file "test" (only directories "foo" and "bar" receive
events).

Furthermore it could be argued that link count belongs to file's metadata and
thus IN_ATTRIB should be sent when it changes.

The following patch implements sending of IN_ATTRIB inotify events when link
count of the inode changes, i.e., when a hardlink to the inode is created or
when it is removed.  This event is sent in addition to all the events sent so
far.  In particular, when a last link to a file is removed, IN_ATTRIB event is
sent in addition to IN_DELETE_SELF event.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: default avatarMorten Welinder <mwelinder@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Love <rlove@google.com>
Cc: John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
Cc: Steven French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 6d985161
...@@ -2188,6 +2188,7 @@ int vfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry) ...@@ -2188,6 +2188,7 @@ int vfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
/* We don't d_delete() NFS sillyrenamed files--they still exist. */ /* We don't d_delete() NFS sillyrenamed files--they still exist. */
if (!error && !(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NFSFS_RENAMED)) { if (!error && !(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NFSFS_RENAMED)) {
fsnotify_link_count(dentry->d_inode);
d_delete(dentry); d_delete(dentry);
} }
...@@ -2360,7 +2361,7 @@ int vfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *new_de ...@@ -2360,7 +2361,7 @@ int vfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *new_de
error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry); error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry);
mutex_unlock(&old_dentry->d_inode->i_mutex); mutex_unlock(&old_dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
if (!error) if (!error)
fsnotify_create(dir, new_dentry); fsnotify_link(dir, old_dentry->d_inode, new_dentry);
return error; return error;
} }
......
...@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ static inline void fsnotify_inoderemove(struct inode *inode) ...@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ static inline void fsnotify_inoderemove(struct inode *inode)
inotify_inode_is_dead(inode); inotify_inode_is_dead(inode);
} }
/*
* fsnotify_link_count - inode's link count changed
*/
static inline void fsnotify_link_count(struct inode *inode)
{
inotify_inode_queue_event(inode, IN_ATTRIB, 0, NULL, NULL);
}
/* /*
* fsnotify_create - 'name' was linked in * fsnotify_create - 'name' was linked in
*/ */
...@@ -102,6 +110,20 @@ static inline void fsnotify_create(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry) ...@@ -102,6 +110,20 @@ static inline void fsnotify_create(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
audit_inode_child(dentry->d_name.name, dentry, inode); audit_inode_child(dentry->d_name.name, dentry, inode);
} }
/*
* fsnotify_link - new hardlink in 'inode' directory
* Note: We have to pass also the linked inode ptr as some filesystems leave
* new_dentry->d_inode NULL and instantiate inode pointer later
*/
static inline void fsnotify_link(struct inode *dir, struct inode *inode, struct dentry *new_dentry)
{
inode_dir_notify(dir, DN_CREATE);
inotify_inode_queue_event(dir, IN_CREATE, 0, new_dentry->d_name.name,
inode);
fsnotify_link_count(inode);
audit_inode_child(new_dentry->d_name.name, new_dentry, dir);
}
/* /*
* fsnotify_mkdir - directory 'name' was created * fsnotify_mkdir - directory 'name' was created
*/ */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment