Commit edd4a893 authored by Viresh Kumar's avatar Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

Revert "cpufreq: postfix policy directory with the first CPU in related_cpus"

Revert commit 3510fac4 (cpufreq: postfix policy directory with the
first CPU in related_cpus).

Earlier, the policy->kobj was added to the kobject core, before ->init()
callback was called for the cpufreq drivers. Which allowed those drivers
to add or remove, driver dependent, sysfs files/directories to the same
kobj from their ->init() and ->exit() callbacks.

That isn't possible anymore after commit 3510fac4.

Now, there is no other clean alternative that people can adopt.

Its better to revert the earlier commit to allow cpufreq drivers to
create/remove sysfs files from ->init() and ->exit() callbacks.
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent ed757a2c
...@@ -985,6 +985,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu) ...@@ -985,6 +985,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
{ {
struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
struct cpufreq_policy *policy; struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
int ret;
if (WARN_ON(!dev)) if (WARN_ON(!dev))
return NULL; return NULL;
...@@ -1002,7 +1003,13 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu) ...@@ -1002,7 +1003,13 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&policy->real_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&policy->real_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
goto err_free_rcpumask; goto err_free_rcpumask;
kobject_init(&policy->kobj, &ktype_cpufreq); ret = kobject_init_and_add(&policy->kobj, &ktype_cpufreq,
cpufreq_global_kobject, "policy%u", cpu);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: failed to init policy->kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret);
goto err_free_real_cpus;
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->policy_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->policy_list);
init_rwsem(&policy->rwsem); init_rwsem(&policy->rwsem);
spin_lock_init(&policy->transition_lock); spin_lock_init(&policy->transition_lock);
...@@ -1013,6 +1020,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu) ...@@ -1013,6 +1020,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
policy->cpu = cpu; policy->cpu = cpu;
return policy; return policy;
err_free_real_cpus:
free_cpumask_var(policy->real_cpus);
err_free_rcpumask: err_free_rcpumask:
free_cpumask_var(policy->related_cpus); free_cpumask_var(policy->related_cpus);
err_free_cpumask: err_free_cpumask:
...@@ -1117,16 +1126,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) ...@@ -1117,16 +1126,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus); cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
/* Remember CPUs present at the policy creation time. */ /* Remember CPUs present at the policy creation time. */
cpumask_and(policy->real_cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_present_mask); cpumask_and(policy->real_cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_present_mask);
/* Name and add the kobject */
ret = kobject_add(&policy->kobj, cpufreq_global_kobject,
"policy%u",
cpumask_first(policy->related_cpus));
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: failed to add policy->kobj: %d\n", __func__,
ret);
goto out_exit_policy;
}
} }
/* /*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment