Commit eeb409bd authored by Jakub Kicinski's avatar Jakub Kicinski

selftests: net: print report check location in python tests

Developing Python tests is a bit annoying because when test fails
we only print the fail message and no info about which exact check
led to it. Print the location (the first line of this example is new):

  # At /root/ksft-net-drv/./net/nl_netdev.py line 38:
  # Check failed 0 != 10
  not ok 3 nl_netdev.page_pool_check
Reviewed-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412141436.828666-4-kuba@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 72ba6cba
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
import builtins
import inspect
from .consts import KSFT_MAIN_NAME
KSFT_RESULT = None
......@@ -18,32 +19,34 @@ def ksft_pr(*objs, **kwargs):
print("#", *objs, **kwargs)
def _fail(*args):
global KSFT_RESULT
KSFT_RESULT = False
frame = inspect.stack()[2]
ksft_pr("At " + frame.filename + " line " + str(frame.lineno) + ":")
ksft_pr(*args)
def ksft_eq(a, b, comment=""):
global KSFT_RESULT
if a != b:
KSFT_RESULT = False
ksft_pr("Check failed", a, "!=", b, comment)
_fail("Check failed", a, "!=", b, comment)
def ksft_true(a, comment=""):
global KSFT_RESULT
if not a:
KSFT_RESULT = False
ksft_pr("Check failed", a, "does not eval to True", comment)
_fail("Check failed", a, "does not eval to True", comment)
def ksft_in(a, b, comment=""):
global KSFT_RESULT
if a not in b:
KSFT_RESULT = False
ksft_pr("Check failed", a, "not in", b, comment)
_fail("Check failed", a, "not in", b, comment)
def ksft_ge(a, b, comment=""):
global KSFT_RESULT
if a < b:
KSFT_RESULT = False
ksft_pr("Check failed", a, "<", b, comment)
_fail("Check failed", a, "<", b, comment)
def ktap_result(ok, cnt=1, case="", comment=""):
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment