kstrto*: do not describe simple_strto*() as obsolete/replaced
The documentation of the kstrto*() functions describes kstrto*() as "replacements" of the "obsolete" simple_strto*() functions. Both of these terms are inaccurate: they're not replacements because they have different behaviour, and the simple_strto*() are not obsolete because there are cases where they have benefits over kstrto*(). Remove usage of the terms "replacement" and "obsolete" in reference to simple_strto*(), and instead use the term "preferred over". Fixes: 4c925d60 ("kstrto*: add documentation") Fixes: 885e68e8 ("kernel.h: update comment about simple_strto<foo>() functions") Signed-off-by: Kars Mulder <kerneldev@karsmulder.nl> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Eldad Zack <eldad@fogrefinery.com> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Cc: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/29b9-5f234c80-13-4e3aa200@244003027Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment