Commit f02a9ad1 authored by Jeff Layton's avatar Jeff Layton

fs: handle inode->i_version more efficiently

Since i_version is mostly treated as an opaque value, we can exploit that
fact to avoid incrementing it when no one is watching. With that change,
we can avoid incrementing the counter on writes, unless someone has
queried for it since it was last incremented. If the a/c/mtime don't
change, and the i_version hasn't changed, then there's no need to dirty
the inode metadata on a write.

Convert the i_version counter to an atomic64_t, and use the lowest order
bit to hold a flag that will tell whether anyone has queried the value
since it was last incremented.

When we go to maybe increment it, we fetch the value and check the flag
bit.  If it's clear then we don't need to do anything if the update
isn't being forced.

If we do need to update, then we increment the counter by 2, and clear
the flag bit, and then use a CAS op to swap it into place. If that
works, we return true. If it doesn't then do it again with the value
that we fetch from the CAS operation.

On the query side, if the flag is already set, then we just shift the
value down by 1 bit and return it. Otherwise, we set the flag in our
on-stack value and again use cmpxchg to swap it into place if it hasn't
changed. If it has, then we use the value from the cmpxchg as the new
"old" value and try again.

This method allows us to avoid incrementing the counter on writes (and
dirtying the metadata) under typical workloads. We only need to increment
if it has been queried since it was last changed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Tested-by: default avatarKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
parent 3a8c7231
......@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ struct inode {
struct hlist_head i_dentry;
struct rcu_head i_rcu;
};
u64 i_version;
atomic64_t i_version;
atomic_t i_count;
atomic_t i_dio_count;
atomic_t i_writecount;
......
This diff is collapsed.
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment